Cited by 339Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Sex differences in the association between AD biomarkers and cognitive decline

Open access
for the Alzheimer’s Neuroimaging Initiative, Koran, Mary Ellen I., Wagener, Madison, Hohman, Timothy J.·2017·Brain Imaging and Behavior

Abstract

Women are disproportionately affected by Alzheimer's disease (AD) in terms of both disease prevalence and severity. Previous autopsy work has suggested that, in the presence of AD neuropathology, females are more susceptible to the clinical manifestation of AD. This manuscript extends that work by evaluating whether sex alters the established associations between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker levels and brain aging outcomes (hippocampal volume, cognition). Participants were drawn from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and included individuals with normal cognition (n = 348), mild cognitive impairment (n = 565), and AD (n = 185). We leveraged mixed effects regression models to assess the interaction between sex and baseline cerebrospinal fluid biomarker levels of amyloid-β42 (Aβ-42) and total tau on cross-sectional and longitudinal brain aging outcomes. We found a significant interaction between sex and Aβ-42 on longitudinal hippocampal atrophy (p = 0.002), and longitudinal decline in memory (p = 0.017) and executive function (p = 0.025). Similarly, we observed an interaction between sex and total tau level on longitudinal hippocampal atrophy (p = 0.008), and longitudinal decline in executive function (p = 0.034). Women with Aβ-42 and total tau levels indicative of worse pathological changes showed more rapid hippocampal atrophy and cognitive decline. The sex difference was particularly pronounced among individuals with MCI, with lower education, and varied by APOE ε4 allele. These results suggest females may be more susceptible to the clinical manifestation of AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11682-016-9523-8

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After diagnosis, women progress faster with more rapid cognitive and functional declines.

    “After diagnosis, women also progress faster with more rapid cognitive and functional declines [3–8]”

    From Sex-specific DNA methylation differences in Alzheimer’s disease pathology (2021) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Discussion reports faster decline in memory and executive function among women with biomarker levels indicating greater AD pathology. It does not report functional decline, and the finding is conditional on biomarker levels rather than a general finding that women progress faster after diagnosis; the reported sex difference was most pronounced among participants with MCI. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sex is an important factor that contributes to clinical and biological heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease.

    “Sex is an important factor that contributes to the clinical and biological heterogeneities in Alzheimer’s disease (AD)”
  • It is reasonable to expect that further sex differences will be found in digital biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and other clinical conditions, given significant sex differences in neurodegenerative, physiological and cognitive aspects during preclinical stages of AD.

    “Considering that several studies have shown that there are significant sex differences on neurodegenerative, physiological and cognitive aspects during the preclinical stages of AD45, it is reasonable to expect that further sex differences will be found in the digital biomarkers for this and other clinical conditions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Initiative, F. T. A. N., Koran, M. E. I., Wagener, M., & Hohman, T. J.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Hohman, Timothy J.
Venue
Brain Imaging and Behavior
Published
2016-02-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
205-213
ISSN
  • 1931-7557 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-7565
OpenAlex
W2270987730
Cited by
339
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
13.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Imaging and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (K12 HD043483)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32 GM07347)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
sex differences, Alzheimer's disease, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, amyloid-beta 42, total tau, cognitive decline, hippocampal atrophy, mild cognitive impairment, executive function, memory decline, APOE ε4, brain aging, women
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Regression Analysis, Sex Characteristics, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Apolipoprotein E4, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review