Cited by 456Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Relationships between biomarkers in aging and dementia

Open access
Jagust, W. J., Landau, S. M., Shaw, L. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., Koeppe, R. A., Reiman, E. M., Foster, N. L., Petersen, R. C. +3 more·2009·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: PET imaging using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and [(11)C]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) have been proposed as biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD), as have CSF measures of the 42 amino acid beta-amyloid protein (Abeta(1-42)) and total and phosphorylated tau (t-tau and p-tau). Relationships between biomarkers and with disease severity are incompletely understood. METHODS: Ten subjects with AD, 11 control subjects, and 34 subjects with mild cognitive impairment from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative underwent clinical evaluation; CSF measurement of Abeta(1-42), t-tau, and p-tau; and PIB-PET and FDG-PET scanning. Data were analyzed using continuous regression and dichotomous outcomes with subjects classified as "positive" or "negative" for AD based on cutoffs established in patients with AD and controls from other cohorts. RESULTS: Dichotomous categorization showed substantial agreement between PIB-PET and CSF Abeta(1-42) measures (91% agreement, kappa = 0.74), modest agreement between PIB-PET and p-tau (76% agreement, kappa = 0.50), and minimal agreement for other comparisons (kappa <0.3). Mini-Mental State Examination score was significantly correlated with FDG-PET but not with PIB-PET or CSF Abeta(1-42). Regression models adjusted for diagnosis showed that PIB-PET was significantly correlated with Abeta(1-42), t-tau, and p-tau(181p), whereas FDG-PET was correlated only with Abeta(1-42). CONCLUSIONS: PET and CSF biomarkers of Abeta agree with one another but are not related to cognitive impairment. [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET is modestly related to other biomarkers but is better related to cognition. Different biomarkers for Alzheimer disease provide different information from one another that is likely to be complementary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181bc010c

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jagust, W. J., Landau, S. M., Shaw, L. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., Koeppe, R. A., Reiman, E. M., Foster, N. L., Petersen, R. C., Weiner, M. W., Price, J. C., & Mathis, C. A.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2009-10-13
Volume
73
Issue
15
Pages
1193-1199
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1988370080
Cited by
456
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 40
FWCI
25.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10, 1r13mh082463-01, AG024904)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG027984, U01-AG-024904, R01AG027984, U01‐AG10483, R01AG018402, AG-06786, K02AG027998, P50-AG23501, AG024904-S03, AG 024904, AG 16574, U01AG006786, U01AG010483, R01AG031581, R01AG027859, AG027859, R01AG022394, AG027998-01A1, AG018402, R01AG010897, P01-AG19724, R01-AG 10897, P01AG012435, P01AG019724, P50AG023501, P50AG016574)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070729, MH082463, MH 070729)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32 NS07222, NS060184, R21NS060184, R01NS031966, T32NS007222)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR023953, R24 RR021992)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, biomarkers, Pittsburgh compound B PET, FDG-PET, tau phosphorylation, total tau, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, disease severity, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Aniline Compounds, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Peptide Fragments, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Thiazoles, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review