Cited by 375Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceService and Product Innovation

A meta-analysis of satisfaction with complaint handling in services

Orsingher, Chiara, Valentini, Sara, de Angelis, Matteo·2010·Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11747-009-0155-z

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The moderator analysis for study characteristics in Orsingher et al. (2010) is limited to accumulated relationship strength, which does not show to what extent single model relationships are strengthened or weakened by each moderator.

    “Finally, although the authors include several moderators (study characteristics and societal culture), the moderator analysis for study characteristics is limited to accumulated relationship strength, which does not show to what extent single model relationships are strengthened or weakened by each moderator.”

    From A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses (2011) · cites this paper as Orsingher, Valentini, and de Angelis 2010

  • Orsingher, Valentini, and de Angelis (2010) do not integrate organizational responses.

    “Orsingher, Valentini, and de Angelis (2010) do not integrate organizational responses.”

    From A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses (2011) · cites this paper as Orsingher, Valentini, and de Angelis 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orsingher, C., Valentini, S., & de Angelis, M.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Orsingher, Chiara
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published
2009-07-16
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
169-186
ISSN
  • 0092-0703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7824
OpenAlex
W2034725519
Cited by
375
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS - Institutional Research Information System (Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
distributive justice, interactional justice, procedural justice, customer satisfaction, word of mouth, repurchase intention, customer service, perceived justice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review