Cited by 80Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyService and Product InnovationAI in Service Interactions

Customer participation in service recovery: a meta-analysis

Open access
Van Vaerenbergh, Yves, Hazée, Simon, Costers, Annelies·2018·Marketing Letters

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11002-018-9470-9

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Talgø, T., Rødsjø, E. L. (2017) You break it, you fix it? Customer participation in service production and service recovery. Master thesis: BI Norwegian Business School, Norway.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Hazée, S., & Costers, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Marketing Letters
Published
2018-10-03
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
465-483
ISSN
  • 0923-0645 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-059X
OpenAlex
W2797669880
Cited by
80
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Marketing Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G0C5617N, SB/151556)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
customer participation, service recovery, distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, customer satisfaction, customer outcomes, cultural differences, compensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review