Cited by 118Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Cerebrospinal Fluid Microglial Markers in Alzheimer’s Disease: Elevated Chitotriosidase Activity but Lack of Diagnostic Utility

Mattsson, Niklas, Tabatabaei, Shahrzad, Johansson, Per, Hansson, Oskar, Andreasson, Ulf, Månsson, Jan-Eric, Johansson, Jan-Ove, Olsson, Bob +4 more·2011·NeuroMolecular Medicine

Abstract

Activated microglial cells, which are the resident macrophages of the central nervous system, surround amyloid β-plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD) brains. Inflammation including microglial activation may contribute in AD pathogenesis, and biomarkers for this process may thus be of value to study AD pathogenesis and might facilitate development of therapies targeting these cells. We therefore examined cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in patients with AD, other dementias, mild cognitive impairment and in healthy controls. Samples were analyzed for markers with known association to macrophage activity, including chitotriosidase, YKL-40 (CHI3L1, HC gp-39) and chemokine CC motif ligand 2 (CCL2, MCP1). Patients with AD had higher chitotriosidase activity than controls and patients with stable mild cognitive impairment, consistent with the presence of activated microglial cells in AD brains, but with large overlaps between groups. CCL2 and YKL-40 concentrations did not differ among groups. Microglial markers are unlikely to be useful for AD diagnosis, but might be useful for identification of distinct subgroups of patients, and for the development and implementation of drugs targeting microglial pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12017-011-8147-9

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattsson, N., Tabatabaei, S., Johansson, P., Hansson, O., Andreasson, U., Månsson, J.-E., Johansson, J.-O., Olsson, B., Wallin, A., Svensson, J., Blennow, K., & Zetterberg, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Skaraborg Hospital (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Mattsson, Niklas
Venue
NeuroMolecular Medicine
Published
2011-05-13
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
151-159
ISSN
  • 1535-1084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1174
OpenAlex
W2078097676
Cited by
118
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroMolecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Neuroförbundet
  • Medicinska fakulteten, Umeå Universitet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, microglial activation, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, chitotriosidase, YKL-40, MCP-1, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, neuroinflammation, amyloid plaques, diagnostic biomarkers
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Hexosaminidases, Humans, Macrophages, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Up-Regulation, Microglia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review