Cited by 55Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyChild Development and Digital Technology

Peer relationship increasing the risk of social media addiction among Chinese adolescents who have negative emotions

Huang, Lu, Zhang, Jiewen, Duan, Wenjie, He, Longtao·2023·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-021-01997-w

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, L., Zhang, J., Duan, W., & He, L.
Affiliations
  • Yibin University (CN)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Corresponding author
Duan, Wenjie
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2021-07-20
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
7673-7681
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W3184024384
Cited by
55
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8
FWCI
13.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (20SG30)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
social media addiction, peer relationships, negative emotions, adolescents, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, scale validation, moderating effect, Chinese adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review