Cited by 140Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Metaanalysis of mood and substance use disorders in proximal risk for suicide deaths

Open access
Conner, Kenneth R., Bridge, Jeffrey A., Davidson, Dustin J., Pilcher, Carly, Brent, David A.·2019·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

Evidence for proximal risk factors for suicide is based on case-control psychological autopsy studies, with these reports showing that mood and substance use disorders are the most prevalent mental disorders among suicide decedents worldwide and are associated with marked risk. However, moderators of risk and the degree of risk associated with (nonalcohol) drug use disorder are unknown. A comprehensive search was used to identify 35 case-control psychological autopsy studies published worldwide over a 30-year period that were metaanalyzed using random effects models. Major depression, odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 9.14 (5.53, 15.09), and drug use disorder, OR (95% CI) = 7.18 (3.22, 16.01), had large effect sizes, among other results. Risk estimates associated with major depression were greater in studies with a larger proportion of women and those conducted in Asia compared with other regions. There was no evidence of publication bias or that any one study had a disproportionate impact on findings. Risk for suicide associated with major depression appears to be moderated by sex and/or world region. Drug use disorder is a potent risk factor, illustrating the importance of assessing drug use in clinical risk assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12422

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conner, K. R., Bridge, J. A., Davidson, D. J., Pilcher, C., & Brent, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Conner, Kenneth R.
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-28
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
278-292
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2769357572
Cited by
140
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
suicide risk factors, major depressive disorder, substance use disorders, drug use disorders, mood disorders, psychological autopsy, suicide decedents, suicide risk assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Suicide, Risk Assessment, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review