Cited by 248Health Policy Implementation ScienceSchool Health and Nursing EducationBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implementation Science in School Mental Health: Key Constructs in a Developing Research Agenda

Open access

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an implementation science research agenda as it applies to school mental health (SMH). First, we provide an overview of important contextual issues to be considered when addressing research questions pertinent to the implementation of mental health interventions in schools. Next, we critically review three core implementation components: (a) professional development and coaching for school professionals regarding evidence-based practices (EBPs); (b) the integrity of EBPs implemented in schools; and (c) EBP sustainment under typical school conditions. We articulate research questions central to the next generation of research in each of these areas as well as methods to address such questions. Our intent in doing so is to contribute to a developing blueprint to guide community-research partnerships as well as funding agencies in their efforts to advance implementation science in SMH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12310-013-9115-3

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Backer, T. E. (2001). Finding the balance: Program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention: A state-of-the art review. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention.
  2. Blank, R. K., de las Alas, N., & Smith, C. (2008). Does teacher professional development have effects on teaching and learning? Analysis of evaluation findings from programs for mathematics and science teachers in 14 states. Washington, DC: The Council of Chief State School Officers.
  3. Evans, S. W., Schultz, B. K., & DeMars, C. (2013). Coaching for high school students with ADHD: An examination of academic and social outcomes. Manuscript under review.
  4. Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Duda, M., Naoom, S. F., & Van Dyke, M. (2010). Sustainability of evidence-based programs in education. Journal of Evidence-based Practices for Schools, 11(1), 30–46.
  5. Owens, J. S., Dan, M., Alvarez, H., Tener, D., & Oberlin, K. (2007). Using community–university partnerships to advance school mental health programming: Why, what and how? Ohio Mental Health Network for School Success Network News, 4(2), 2–3.
  6. Owens, J. S., Storer, J. L., & Girio, E. L. (2011b). Psychosocial interventions for elementary school-aged children with ADHD. In S. W. Evans & B. Hoza (Eds.), Treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Assessment and intervention in developmental context (pp. 10-2–10-26). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
  7. Perepletchikova, F. (2009). Treatment integrity in treatment outcome research: Adequacy of procedures, associated factors, implications for research and practice, guidelines and recommendations. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.
  8. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusions of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  9. Wagner, M., Gaylor, E., Fabricant, N., & Shaver, D. (2013). Early childhood language intervention models: Lessons learned about model sustainment and spread. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Owens, J. S., Lyon, A. R., Brandt, N. E., Masia Warner, C., Nadeem, E., Spiel, C., & Wagner, M.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • SRI International (US)
Corresponding author
Owens, Julie Sarno
Venue
School Mental Health
Published
2013-12-17
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
99-111
ISSN
  • 1866-2625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-2633
OpenAlex
W2067657602
Cited by
247
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • School Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH083694, R01MH081881, P30MH090322, K08MH095939, R25MH080916)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
implementation science, evidence-based practice, professional development, coaching, fidelity, program sustainability, school-based intervention, research agenda, community research partnerships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review