Cited by 268Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cerebellar Purkinje Cells are Reduced in a Subpopulation of Autistic Brains: A Stereological Experiment Using Calbindin-D28k

Abstract

Although a decreased number of cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs) in the autistic brain has been widely reported with a variety of qualitative and quantitative methods, the more accurate method of cell counting with modern stereology has not yet been employed. An additional possible problem with prior reports is the use of Nissl staining to identify the PCs, as this can miss cells due to staining irregularities. In the present study, PCs were immunostained for calbindin-D28k (CB), as this has been shown to be a more reliable marker for PCs than the Nissl stain, with more than 99% of the PCs immunopositive (Whitney, Kemper, Rosene, Bauman, Blatt, J Neurosci Methods 168:42-47, 2008). Using stereology and CB immunostaining, the density of PCs was determined in serial sections from a consistently defined area of the cerebellar hemisphere in four control and six autistic brains, with the density of PCs then correlated with the clinical severity of autism. Overall, there was no significant difference in the density of PCs between the autistic and control groups. However, three of six autistic brains had PC numbers that fell within the control range, whereas the remaining three autistic brains revealed a reduction compared with the control brains. These data demonstrate that a reduction in cerebellar PCs was not a consistent feature of these autistic brains and that it occurred without discernible correlation between their density and the clinical features or severity of autism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12311-008-0043-y

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Whitney, E. R., Kemper, T. L., Bauman, M. L., Rosene, D. L., & Blatt, G. J.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Whitney, Elizabeth R.
Venue
The Cerebellum
Published
2008-06-28
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
406-416
ISSN
  • 1473-4222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4230
OpenAlex
W2136932965
Cited by
268
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Cerebellum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Hussman Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD039459, HD39459)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Purkinje cells, autism spectrum disorder, calbindin-D28k, stereology, cell counting, cerebellum, Nissl staining
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Brain, Cerebellum, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Purkinje Cells, Reference Values, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Young Adult, Calbindins, S100 Calcium Binding Protein G, Calbindin 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review