Cited by 156Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Effectiveness of a Web-based Intervention Aimed at Healthy Dietary and Physical Activity Behavior: A Randomized Controlled Trial About Users and Usage

Open access
Kelders, Saskia M, Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E.W.C, Werkman, Andrea, Nijland, Nicol, Seydel, Erwin R·2011·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown the potential of Web-based interventions for changing dietary and physical activity (PA) behavior. However, the pathways of these changes are not clear. In addition, nonusage poses a threat to these interventions. Little is known of characteristics of participants that predict usage. OBJECTIVE: In this study we investigated the users and effect of the Healthy Weight Assistant (HWA), a Web-based intervention aimed at healthy dietary and PA behavior. We investigated the value of a proposed framework (including social and economic factors, condition-related factors, patient-related factors, reasons for use, and satisfaction) to predict which participants are users and which participants are nonusers. Additionally, we investigated the effectiveness of the HWA on the primary outcomes, self-reported dietary and physical activity behavior. METHODS: Our design was a two-armed randomized controlled trial that compared the HWA with a waiting list control condition. A total of 150 participants were allocated to the waiting list group, and 147 participants were allocated to the intervention group. Online questionnaires were filled out before the intervention period started and after the intervention period of 12 weeks. After the intervention period, respondents in the waiting list group could use the intervention. Objective usage data was obtained from the application itself. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 64% (81/147) of respondents used the HWA at least once and were categorized as "users." Of these, 49% (40/81) used the application only once. Increased age and not having a chronic condition increased the odds of having used the HWA (age: beta = 0.04, P = .02; chronic condition: beta = 2.24, P = .003). Within the intervention group, users scored better on dietary behavior and on knowledge about healthy behavior than nonusers (self-reported diet: χ²₂ = 8.4, P = .02; knowledge: F₁,₁₂₅ = 4.194, P = .04). Furthermore, users underestimated their behavior more often than nonusers, and nonusers overestimated their behavior more often than users (insight into dietary behavior: χ²₂ = 8.2, P = .02). Intention-to-treat analyses showed no meaningful significant effects of the intervention. Exploratory analyses of differences between pretest and posttest scores of users, nonusers, and the control group showed that on dietary behavior only the nonusers significantly improved (effect size r = -.23, P = .03), while on physical activity behavior only the users significantly improved (effect size r = -.17, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Respondents did not use the application as intended. From the proposed framework, a social and economic factor (age) and a condition-related factor (chronic condition) predicted usage. Moreover, users were healthier and more knowledgeable about healthy behavior than nonusers. We found no apparent effects of the intervention, although exploratory analyses showed that choosing to use or not to use the intervention led to different outcomes. Combined with the differences between groups at baseline, this seems to imply that these groups are truly different and should be treated as separate entities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial ID number: ISRCTN42687923; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN42687923/ (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5xnGmvQ9Y).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1624

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [56]Fogg BJ Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do 2003 San Francisco, CA Morgan Kaufmann Publishers

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelders, S. M., Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C., Werkman, A., Nijland, N., & Seydel, E. R.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
  • Netherlands Nutrition Centre (NL)
  • University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Kelders, Saskia M
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2011-04-14
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
e32
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108688172
Cited by
156
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
29.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
online intervention, dietary behavior, physical activity behavior, non-users, user satisfaction, self-efficacy, self-monitoring, health behavior change, weight management, chronic disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Informatics, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Waiting Lists, Health Behavior, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review