Cited by 282Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionForgiveness and Related Behaviors

Compassion for Others and Self-Compassion: Levels, Correlates, and Relationship with Psychological Well-being

Open access
López, Angélica, Sanderman, Robbert, Ranchor, Adelita V., Schroevers, Maya J.·2018·Mindfulness

Abstract

Compassion for others and self-compassion are assumed to be closely related concepts. Yet, as they have been mostly studied separately, little is known about their relationship and to what extent they differ or resemble each other with respect to their correlates. This cross-sectional study aimed to gain knowledge on their mean levels, interrelationship, and relationships to psychological well-being and demographic factors. A community sample of 328 adults completed a series of standardized self-report questionnaires to assess compassion for others, self-compassion, depressive symptoms, negative affect, and positive affect. Results showed that compassion for others and self-compassion were not significantly related. Self-compassion was more strongly related to negative and positive indicators of affect than compassion for others. Compassion for others was higher in women than in men, and in low educated individuals compared to higher educated individuals. In contrast, self-compassion was lower in low educated individuals. Future research can build up on these findings to enlarge the understanding of how compassion for others and self-compassion relate and differ from each other.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-017-0777-z

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings related to the relationship between compassion for others and mental health are markedly different from findings related to self-compassion and psychopathology, and in line with previous research.

    “Findings related to the relationship between compassion for others and mental health are markedly different from findings related to self-compassion and psychopathology, and in line with previous research [13].”

    From Validation of the compassionate engagement and action scales, compassion scale, and Sussex-Oxford compassion scales in a French-Canadian sample (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion reports that self-compassion was associated with fewer depressive symptoms and less negative affect, while compassion for others was not significantly related to psychological well-being. It describes the findings on compassion for others as only partly in line with previous studies: those studies found no greater decrease in depressive symptoms, but did find increased happiness. The claim overstates the agreement with previous research. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gilbert, P. (2016). Three orientations of compassion and the development of their self-report measures. In M. Schroevers (Chair). Self-Compassion: assessment and benefits for psychological well-being. Symposium conducted at the Second International conference on mindfulness, Rome.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
López, A., Sanderman, R., Ranchor, A. V., & Schroevers, M. J.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
López, Angélica
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2017-07-18
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
325-331
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2736494566
Cited by
281
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
17.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Keywords
compassion for others, self-compassion, psychological well-being, affect, depressive symptoms, gender differences, educational attainment, positive affect, negative affect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review