Cited by 125Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Protection as the Mirror Image of Psychopathology: Further Critical Notes on the Self-Compassion Scale

Muris, Peter, Otgaar, Henry, Petrocchi, Nicola·2016·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-016-0509-9

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muris, P., Otgaar, H., & Petrocchi, N.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • John Cabot University (IT)
Corresponding author
Muris, Peter
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2016-03-21
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
787-790
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2309301885
Cited by
125
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7
FWCI
14.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
self-compassion, Self-Compassion Scale, psychopathology, protective factors, psychometric validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review