Cited by 35Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Exploring the Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Compassion for Others: The Role of Psychological Distress and Wellbeing

Open access
García-Campayo, Javier, Barceló-Soler, Alberto, Martínez-Rubio, David, Navarrete, Jaime, Pérez-Aranda, Adrián, Feliu-Soler, Albert, Luciano, Juan V., Baer, Ruth +2 more·2024·Assessment

Abstract

We addressed construct validity and explored the relationship between self-compassion and compassion for others using the two main current operationalizations of compassion (Neff’s and the Sussex-Oxford Compassion Scales, SOCSs). Relationships with psychological distress and wellbeing, and potential differences in the association between self-compassion and compassion for others by level of psychological distress and wellbeing were also explored. Participants ( n = 811) completed the Spanish adaptations of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), the Compassion Scale (CS), the SOCSs (for the self/others), the Short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21). We fitted bifactor models to estimate the general factor of each construct for the different operationalizations, and calculated correlations between them. Relationships between self-compassion and compassion for others from the same operationalization were intermediate, while those between the same constructs from different operationalizations were large. Both constructs showed positive associations with wellbeing, while only self-compassion was associated with decreased psychological distress. Participants with good mental health showed higher associations between self-compassion and compassion for others than those with poorer mental health. Self-compassion and compassion for others appear to be dimensional constructs that can converge or diverge. When they converge, it is associated with better mental health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10731911231203966

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Feldman C. Kuyken W. (2019). Mindfulness: Ancient wisdom meets modern psychology. Guilford Press.
  2. Keltner D. Kogan A. (2018). Compassionate love: A framework for research. Emotion Review, 10(2), 112– 121. 10.1177/1754073917749619 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García-Campayo, J., Barceló-Soler, A., Martínez-Rubio, D., Navarrete, J., Pérez-Aranda, A., Feliu-Soler, A., Luciano, J. V., Baer, R., Kuyken, W., & Montero-Marin, J.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Health Research of Aragon (IIS Aragon), Zaragoza, Spain
  • Universidad Europea de Valencia, Spain
  • Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES)
  • Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health—CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
Venue
Assessment
Published
2023-10-15
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
1038-1051
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W4387660905
Cited by
35
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica (Universidad Europea) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zaguan (Universidad de Zaragoza) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (WT104908/Z/14/Z, WT107496/Z/15/Z)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
self-compassion, compassion for others, psychological distress, well-being, construct validity, bifactor model, Self-Compassion Scale, Compassion Scale, mental health, depression, anxiety, stress
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Spain, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review