Cited by 289Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Validation of the psychometric properties of the Self-Compassion Scale. testing the factorial validity and factorial invariance of the measure among borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorder, eating disorder and general populations

Open access
Costa, Joana, Marôco, João, Pinto‐Gouveia, José, Ferreira, Cláudia, Castilho, Paula·2016·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the last years, there has been a growing interest in self-compassion. Empirical evidences show that self-compassion is associated with psychological benefits among young adults and it might be considered a buffer factor in several mental disorders. AIMS: The aim of this study was to validate the psychometric properties of the Self-compassion Scale (SCS: Neff, 2003a) after the initial lack of replicating the original six-factor structure. METHOD: Data were collected from the overall database of a research centre (56 men and 305 women; mean age = 25.19) and comprised four groups: borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorder, eating disorder and general population. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor model (self-compassionate attitude versus self-critical attitude) with good internal consistencies, construct-related validity and external validity. Configural, weak measurement and structural invariance of the two-factor model of SCS were also shown. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the generalizability of the two-factor model and show that both properties and interpretations of scores on self-compassion are equivalent across these population groups. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. KEY PRACTITIONER MESSAGE: A two-factor structure of SCS with strong psychometric validity was supported in clinical and non-clinical samples. Helping individuals with limited experiences of compassion to develop positive internal processing systems seems to be related with better mental health, self-acceptance and self-nurturing abilities. The non-probabilistic sampling limits the generalization of our conclusions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.1974

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, J., Marôco, J., Pinto‐Gouveia, J., Ferreira, C., & Castilho, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • ISPA - Instituto Universitário (PT)
Corresponding author
Costa, Joana
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
460-468
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W1646428732
Cited by
289
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 2
FWCI
29.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/78227/2011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
self-compassion, Self-Compassion Scale, psychometric validation, measurement invariance, two-factor model, borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, cross-population generalizability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Borderline Personality Disorder, Empathy, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review