Cited by 5Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Conceptual Congruence in Mindfulness-Based Weight Loss Intervention Studies

Open access
Schultz, Michael B.·2018·Mindfulness

Abstract

Whether one kind of mindfulness applies to all situations or only some (i.e., scope) is controversial. Eating may not be an everyday behavior subsumed under everyday mindfulness. To rigorously test the efficacy of mindfulness-based weight loss interventions, researchers must use scales that measure the type of mindfulness manipulated by the intervention. The mixed findings of mindfulness-based weight loss intervention studies may be related to the lack of conceptual congruence (i.e., the pairing of interventions and measures of the same scope). The aims of this systematic review were to: (a) describe the scopes of the mindfulness interventions and measures used in mindfulness-based weight loss intervention studies; and (b) compare conceptual congruence to the statistical significance of mindfulness and weight outcomes of each study. All articles published prior to December 31, 2016 were retrieved from PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase. After screening and full-text review, eight articles were included in the review. Five studies paired mindfulness-based eating interventions with general mindfulness measures; two studies paired mindfulness-based eating interventions with eating-specific mindfulness measures; and one study paired a general mindfulness intervention with a general mindfulness measure. There was no apparent relationship between conceptual congruence and the statistical significance of the mindfulness and weight outcomes. However, given other findings and the limitations of this review, further investigation is needed. In particular, future studies should include mediation analyses using both general and eating-specific mindfulness measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-017-0860-5

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential mediating roles of depression and BMI in the relationship between the four facets of mindful eating and eating disorders remain understudied.

    “However, the potential mediating roles of depression and body mass index (BMI) in the relationship between the four facets of mindful eating and eating disorders remain understudied.”

    From Four Facet Mindful Eating and Eating Disorder Risk: Mediation By Depression and Body Mass Index. (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion calls for mediation analyses of how general and eating-specific mindfulness relate to weight-loss outcomes. The Introduction describes five factors of mindful eating, not four. Neither passage addresses whether depression and BMI mediate a relationship between mindful-eating facets and eating disorders; searches for those mediators and that relationship found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schultz, M. B.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Schultz, Michael B.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2017-11-25
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
1028-1036
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2768594830
Cited by
5
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (F31NR017108, T32NR007091)
  • Jonas Center for Nursing Excellence and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (Jonas Nurse Scholars Program)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
weight loss outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review