Cited by 145Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Towards a second generation of mindfulness-based interventions

Van Gordon, William, Shonin, Edo, Griffiths, Mark D·2015·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867415577437

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with first-generation mindfulness-based interventions, SG-MBIs use a slightly different model of mindfulness that highlights the importance of nonattachment to self, as well as to psychological and somatic symptoms.

    “Compared with the first-generation mindfulnessbased interventions, SG-MBIs use a slightly different model of mindfulness that highlights the importance of nonattachment to self, as well as to psychological and somatic symptoms (Van Gordon et al., 2015).”

    From Improving Psychosocial Functioning in Mastectomized Women Through a Mindfulness-Based Program: Flow Meditation. (2020) · cites this paper as Van Gordon et al., 2015

    The ‘Differences between FGMBIs and SG-MBIs’ section (p. 1) says SG-MBIs teach a different model of mindfulness; the passage on p. 2 includes non-self among the principles they teach. The ‘Issues and key empirical findings’ section (p. 2) discusses distance from cognitive and affective processes, but describes this as a mechanism shared with first-generation interventions. Our copy does not identify nonattachment to psychological and somatic symptoms as a distinguishing feature of SG-MBIs. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • 'Second generation' mindfulness-based interventions are openly spiritual in nature, make the linkage to the Buddhist teachings explicit within the pedagogy and are more traditional in the manner in which they construct and teach mindfulness.

    “An important example are ' second generation ' mindfulness-based interventions which are openly spiritual in nature, make the linkage to the Buddhist teachingsexplicitwithinthepedagogyandaremoretraditional in the manner in which they construct and teach mindfulness(e.g.VanGordon et al. 2015).”

    From What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft (2017) · cites this paper as Van Gordon et al. 2015

    The discussion on p. 2 says SG-MBIs explicitly use the term “spiritual” and teach mindfulness alongside principles traditionally associated with Buddhist practice. The Implications section (p. 2) also says they more closely follow a traditional approach. Our copy does not establish that the pedagogy explicitly identifies those principles as Buddhist teachings; it describes the approach as secular. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Gordon, W., Shonin, E., & Griffiths, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2015-03-23
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
591-592
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2150073591
Cited by
145
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6
FWCI
18.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, mindfulness
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Buddhism, Humans, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review