Cited by 62Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Lack of research on efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: A systematic review

Open access
Kothgassner, Oswald D., Felnhofer, Anna·2021·neuropsychiatrie

Abstract

Summary: Anxiety disorders are one of the most prevalent mental disorders in children and adolescents which may effectively be treated by several forms of exposure therapy. An emerging approach to exposure is virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET), but a literature search synthesis focusing specifically on the use of VRET in children and adolescents is still lacking. This systematic review sets out to provide an overview concerning VRET for the treatment of anxiety disorders in this age group. Four published trials covering an overall sample of 100 participants between the ages of 8 and 16 years were found during a systematic literature search and were included in the current review. Results reveal that participants show clinical improvements regarding anxiety symptoms after VRET. Nevertheless, the high potential of virtual reality as a tool for treating children and adolescents with anxiety disorders is contrasted by a considerable lack of controlled trials. Despite the evidence of VRET in adult samples, there is a need for more research with younger cohorts in order to be able to support this promising field of application.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40211-020-00349-7

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The application of VR in youth mental health remains critically underexplored.

    “its application in youth mental health remains critically underexplored [5,6]”

    From A Virtual Reality–Based Cognitive Defusion Application for Youth Depression and Anxiety: Mixed Methods Experimental Study. (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion says research on virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for children and adolescents with anxiety disorders is “still scarce at best” and calls for more trials. That supports an underexploration claim for this treatment and condition, but not the broader claim about VR across youth mental health. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Relatively limited research has explored the potential therapeutic applications of VR beyond exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy approaches, and research in youth is highly limited.

    “However, relatively limited research has explored the potential therapeutic applications of VR beyond exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches, and research in youth is highly limited [2,5,6,16].”

    From A Virtual Reality–Based Cognitive Defusion Application for Youth Depression and Anxiety: Mixed Methods Experimental Study. (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says research on VRET for children and adolescents with anxiety disorders is “scarce at best,” supporting the claim that research in youth is limited in that context. The paper focuses on exposure therapy; it does not establish how much research has explored therapeutic uses of VR beyond exposure-based CBT. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kothgassner, O. D., & Felnhofer, A.
Affiliations
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Kothgassner, Oswald D.
  • Felnhofer, Anna
Venue
neuropsychiatrie
Published
2020-05-05
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
68-75
ISSN
  • 0948-6259 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-1327
OpenAlex
W3023238954
Cited by
61
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatrie (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical University of Vienna
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, anxiety disorders, children, adolescents, exposure therapy, treatment efficacy, clinical trials, virtual reality
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review