Cited by 52Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsCommunication in Education and HealthcareAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

SpeakApp-Kids! Virtual reality training to reduce fear of public speaking in children–A proof of concept

Open access
Sülter, Robin E., Ketelaar, Paul E., Lange, Wolf-Gero·2022·Computers & Education

Abstract

Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) is a promising tool to reduce public speaking anxiety in adults, while treatment and prevention of public speaking anxiety in children has been largely neglected. We examined whether repeated brief exposures to a virtual audience embedded in a prototype of the Virtual Reality (VR) SpeakApp-Kids! helped to reduce (1) self-reported state anxiety during three public speaking practice sessions, (2) state anxiety during the actual presentation that followed, and (3) general public speaking anxiety from the first practice session until after the actual presentation in children aged 9–12 years ( n = 40). First, we found a decrease in state anxiety during the first two practice sessions. Also in line with our expectations, pupils in the SpeakApp-Kids! condition reported lower state anxiety during the actual presentation than the control (at home) condition ( n = 49). Finally, we found a larger decrease in general public speaking anxiety from the first practice session until one week after the actual presentation for the SpeakApp-Kids! condition, as compared to the control children preparing their presentations as usual. Taking limitations into account, this VR SpeakApp-Kids! is a promising tool to be developed further as it has potential to serve as an educational tool for speech practice and thereby reducing public speaking anxiety. More importantly, it has potential to prevent public speaking anxiety from developing in the first place.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104384

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sülter, R. E., Ketelaar, P. E., & Lange, W.-G.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Sülter, Robin E.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
178
Pages
104384
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217078953
Cited by
52
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, public speaking anxiety, children, state anxiety, virtual audience, anxiety prevention, speech practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review