Cited by 12Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyCongenital Heart Disease StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Congenital Heart Disease

Open access
Tandon, Animesh, Bhattacharya, Sarnab, Morca, Ayse, Inan, Omer T, Munther, Daniel S, Ryan, Shawn D, Latifi, Samir Q, Lu, Nanshu +3 more·2023·Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of review Cardiac output (CO) is a fundamental physiological parameter that measures the volume of blood that is pumped by the heart per unit of time, and helps define how oxygen is delivered to the tissues of the human body. In this paper, we discuss current methods of continuous CO monitoring while defining low CO syndrome (LCOS) and how analytical tools may help improve CO management in the subpopulation of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Recent findings Non-invasive methods of measuring CO have become increasingly available in recent years. Advantages of non-invasive over invasive techniques include decreased risk of procedural complications, decreased exposure to sedative and/or anesthetic agents, and increased patient comfort. Pediatric patient populations are particularly sensitive to the risks and complications of invasive techniques given the relative size of current technologies to pediatric vascular and cardiac dimensions. Summary Novel device technologies, combined with emerging analytical techniques, may help improve measurement of CO in children and those with CHD, and allow earlier detection of LCOS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40746-023-00274-1

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tandon, A., Bhattacharya, S., Morca, A., Inan, O. T., Munther, D. S., Ryan, S. D., Latifi, S. Q., Lu, N., Lasa, J. J., Marino, B. S., & Baloglu, O.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Cleveland State University (US)
  • Texas Materials Institute (US)
  • Children's Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Tandon, Animesh
Venue
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics
Published
2023-09-25
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
247-259
ISSN
2198-6088 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387017889
Cited by
12
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2133106)
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Southwestern Medical Foundation
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-20-1-2112, N00014)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
cardiac output monitoring, congenital heart disease, non-invasive measurement, low cardiac output syndrome, pediatric patients, continuous hemodynamic monitoring, device technology, early detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review