Cited by 196Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologySexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Problematic Mobile Phone Use and Addiction Across Generations: the Roles of Psychopathological Symptoms and Smartphone Use

Open access
Kuss, Daria J., Kanjo, Eiman, Crook-Rumsey, Mark, Kibowski, Fraenze, Wang, Grace Y., Sumich, Alex·2018·Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science

Abstract

Contemporary technological advances have led to a significant increase in using mobile technologies. Recent research has pointed to potential problems as a consequence of mobile overuse, including addiction, financial problems, dangerous use (i.e. whilst driving) and prohibited use (i.e. use in forbidden areas). The aim of this study is to extend previous findings regarding the predictive power of psychopathological symptoms (depression, anxiety and stress), mobile phone use (i.e. calls, SMS, time spent on the phone, as well as the engagement in specific smartphone activities) across Generations X and Y on problematic mobile phone use in a sample of 273 adults. Findings revealed prohibited use and dependence were predicted by calls/day, time on the phone and using social media. Only for dependent mobile phone use (rather than prohibited), stress appeared as significant. Using social media and anxiety significantly predicted belonging to Generation Y, with calls per day predicted belonging to Generation X. This finding suggests Generation Y are more likely to use asynchronous social media-based communication, whereas Generation X engage more in synchronous communication. The findings have implications for prevention and awareness-raising efforts of possibly problematic mobile phone use for educators, parents and individuals, particularly including dependence and prohibited use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41347-017-0041-3

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mobile phone use is understood to lead to alterations in everyday life habits and perceptions of reality, associated with negative outcomes including impaired social interactions, social isolation, and somatic and mental health problems.

    “Using mobile phones is understood as leading to alterations in everyday life habits and perceptions of reality, which can be associated with negative outcomes, such as impaired social interactions, social isolation, as well as both somatic and mental health problems, including anxiety, depression, and stress [85,87].”

    From Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned (2017) · cites this paper as [87]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gafni R Geri N Eshet-Alkalai Y Caspi A Eden S Geri N Kalman Y Yair Y Generation Y vs Generation X: differences in smartphone adaptation Proceedings of the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research 2013: learning in the technological era 2013 Raanana Open University of Israel 18 23
  2. Kanjo, E., Kuss, D. J., and Ang, C. S. (2017). NotiMind: responses to smartphone notifications as affective sensors. IEEE Access, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuss, D. J., Kanjo, E., Crook-Rumsey, M., Kibowski, F., Wang, G. Y., & Sumich, A.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Kuss, Daria J.
Venue
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Published
2018-01-08
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
141-149
ISSN
2366-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772395238
Cited by
196
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
107.62
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) (acceptedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
British Academy (SG162119)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
problematic mobile phone use, mobile phone addiction, smartphone addiction, Generation X, millennials, psychiatric symptoms, depression, anxiety, stress, social media use, synchronous communication, asynchronous communication, mobile phone calls

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review