Cited by 10COVID-19 and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Anxiety Sensitivity Mediates Relations Between Mental Distress Symptoms and Medical Care Utilization During COVID-19 Pandemic.

Open access
Khoury, Juliana M. B., Watt, Margo C., MacLean, Kim·2021·International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

Abstract

Anxiety and uncertainty are common during pandemics. The present study extended previous pandemic research by investigating the role of two transdiagnostic risk factors — anxiety sensitivity (AS: fear of physiological anxiety or "fear of fear"; Reiss & McNally, 1985) and intolerance of uncertainty (IU; Buhr & Dugas, 2009) — in explaining relations between mental distress symptoms and behavioural responding during the COVID-19 pandemic. Student and community-based participants (N=457; 87.6% female) were recruited between May and July 2020 to complete measures of anxiety (health, panic, general), depression, and stress. Anxiety and related symptoms were found to be higher than in previous studies. Parallel mediation analyses showed that clinically meaningful levels of mental distress symptoms directly influenced safety behaviours and medical care utilization but also indirectly influenced the latter (vs. former) through AS-physical concerns (vs. IU). CBT interventions, targeting AS-physical concerns, may reduce mental distress symptoms during pandemic and prevent overuse of healthcare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41811-021-00113-x

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 13 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Finding

    The sample's medical care utilization and safety behaviour scores were higher than in comparison studies.

    “Utilization of medical resources as measured by part 2 of the MUQ were significantly higher in the present sample (M = 7.75, SD = 5.56) as compared to Abramowitz et al.’s (2007) non-clinical sample: M = 0.55 (0.47), t(897) = 29.90, 95% CI [7.17, 8.22), p < .000, and to Fergus and Valentiner’s (2010) non-clinical sample: M = 6.46 (5.37), t(958) = 3.66, 95% CI [0.60, 1.98], p < 0.01.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Abramowitz et al. (2007) source

      The Results (Preliminary analyses) report 0.55 (SD = 0.47) as the mean for MUQ safety-seeking behaviors, not medical-resource utilization. They report a separate mean of 4.27 medical/health-service visits (SD = 4.84). Thus the citing sentence uses a safety-behavior score as its medical-utilization comparator. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Fergus and Valentiner’s (2010) source
  • Method

    The COVID-19 Fear Index was created for the study to assess participants' fear concerning COVID-19.

    “the CFI was constructed for the current study to assess participants’ level of fear concerning COVID-19.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Blakey & Abramowitz, 2017 source

      The Design > Main Outcome Measure passage describes an inventory for Zika-related anxiety, not a COVID-19 Fear Index. Searches for the COVID-19 Fear Index and a COVID-19 fear scale found no passage addressing whether the index was constructed for the citing study. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Blakey et al., 2015 source

      The Method > Measures section describes an Ebola Fear Inventory created for that paper’s study to assess fear of Ebola. It does not describe a COVID-19 Fear Index; the instrument and disease named in the claim differ from those in the cited paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Brand et al., 2013 source

      The Methods > Measures section describes an inventory assessing fear of Swine Flu, not a COVID-19 Fear Index. A search for the COVID-19 Fear Index and its construction found no passage addressing whether the citing study created that measure. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Finding

    The authors report that levels of health anxiety and depression, anxiety, and stress were significantly higher in the sample than in prior studies.

    “Levels of health anxiety as measured by the SHAI also were significantly higher in the present sample (M = 16.84, SD = 8.08) as compared to Wheaton et al. (2012): M = 12.03 (6.75), t(770) = 8.68, 95% CI [3.72, 5.90], p < .000, and Blakey and Abramowitz (2017): M = 12.44 (5.75), t(671) = 7.19, 95% CI [3.20, 5.60], p < .000.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wheaton et al. (2012) source
    • cites Blakey and Abramowitz (2017) source
  • Finding

    Higher levels of anxiety sensitivity-physical concerns and intolerance of uncertainty were observed in the present sample compared with previous pandemic studies.

    “As compared to previous pandemic studies, levels of AS-physical concerns in the present sample (M = 7.30, SD = 5.88) were significantly higher than those found by Wheaton et al. (2012): M = 3.63 (4.14), t(770) = 9.56, 95% CI [2.92, 4.42], p < .000; Blakey and Abramowitz (2017): M = 4.42 (4.52), t(671) = 6.36, 95% CI [1.99, 3.77], p < .000; and Blakey et al. (2015): M = 4.34 (4.29), t(562) = 4.91, 95% CI [1.78, 4.14], p < .001.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wheaton et al. (2012) source
    • cites Blakey and Abramowitz (2017) source
    • cites Blakey et al. (2015) source
  • Finding

    The authors conclude that elevated mental distress symptoms had direct effects on both behavioral outcomes and an indirect effect on medical care utilization through anxiety sensitivity-physical concerns but not intolerance of uncertainty.

    “In summary, mediation analyses showed that elevated mental distress symptoms yielded a direct effect on both COVID safety behaviours and medical care utilization, as well as an indirect effect on medical care utilization (but not safety behaviours) through AS-physical concerns (but not IU).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Discussion prevalence claims conflict with the stated symptom cutoffs

    Major

    The discussion describes roughly two-thirds of participants as having concerning general anxiety, more than half as having depression, and one-third as having elevated stress. The methods say the extreme cutoffs used to form the symptom groups were met by 25%, 20.8%, and 13.6%, respectively.

  • Procedure date conflicts with abstract date

    Minor

    The paper gives two different data-collection start dates. One section says participants were recruited between May and July 2020, while another says data were collected starting April 27, 2020.

  • Two ASI-3 subscales are assigned the same items

    Minor

    Physical Concerns and Social Concerns are presented as separate six-item subscales of an 18-item measure, yet their item lists are identical.

  • Panic attacks are both associated and not associated with safety behaviours

    Minor

    The correlations section says every mental-distress measure was significantly associated with the dependent variables, which include safety behaviours. The discussion says recent panic attacks were not significantly associated with safety behaviours.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences. In Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khoury, J. M. B., Watt, M. C., & MacLean, K.
Affiliations
  • St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Khoury, Juliana M. B.
Venue
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
Published
2021-06-21
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
515-536
ISSN
  • 1937-1209 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-1217
OpenAlex
W3175567286
Cited by
10
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cognitive Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, psychological distress, health care utilization, COVID-19 pandemic, safety behavior, depression, stress, panic, transdiagnostic risk factors, cognitive behavioral therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read (extract-v1) on 2026-09-24.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review