Cited by 31Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMicroRNA in disease regulationExtracellular vesicles in disease

Identification of MicroRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in Ovarian Endometriosis

Gu, Cheng-lei, Zhang, Zhe, Fan, Wen-sheng, Li, Li-an, Ye, Ming-xia, Zhang, Qian, Zhang, Ni-na, Li, Zhen +1 more·2020·Reproductive Sciences

Abstract

Endometriosis, as a prevalent gynecological disease, is characterized by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, causing infertility and considerable pain and affecting the quality of life of women. The pathogenic mechanism has not been fully elucidated, and there are no effective biomarkers for endometriosis. In our study, microRNA (miRNA) expression profiling of 10 ectopic endometrial plasma from patients with ovarian endometriosis and 10 normal plasma from healthy controls was analyzed using a microarray. As a result, 114 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified. Among them, 14 miRNAs were significantly downregulated in patients with ovarian endometriosis, which matched the microarray results. The diagnostic value of the 14 downregulated miRNAs in ovarian endometriosis was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and hsa-let-7i-5p showed the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) with a value of 0.900. The target genes of the 14 miRNAs were predicted by miRWalk2.0, and the genes that were targeted by at least 2 of the 14 miRNAs were analyzed by function enrichment. The target genes were significantly enriched in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, such as microRNAs in cancer, bladder cancer, and endocrine resistance pathways, and the Gene Ontology (GO) terms such as nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process, cellular nitrogen compound biosynthetic process, and heterocycle metabolic process. The identified 14 differentially expressed miRNAs could be potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s43032-020-00148-z

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gu, C.-L., Zhang, Z., Fan, W.-S., Li, L.-A., Ye, M.-X., Zhang, Q., Zhang, N.-N., Li, Z., & Meng, Y.-G.
Affiliations
Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
Venue
Reproductive Sciences
Published
2020-07-10
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
1715-1723
ISSN
  • 1933-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-7205
OpenAlex
W3042052439
Cited by
31
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
endometrioma, microRNA, biomarkers, diagnostic value, miRNA target genes, KEGG pathway enrichment, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Ovarian Diseases, Signal Transduction, Biomarkers, Down-Regulation, Gene Expression Profiling, MicroRNAs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review