Cited by 653Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlHealthcare Systems and Public Health

Circadian variation in the incidence of sudden cardiac death in the framingham heart study population

Willich, Stefan N., Levy, Daniel, Rocco, Michael B., Tofler, Geoffrey H., Stone, Peter H., Muller, James E.·1987·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

To determine if sudden cardiac death shows circadian variation, the time of day of sudden cardiac deaths in the Framingham Heart Study was analyzed. Analysis was based on mortality data collected in a standardized manner for the past 38 years for each death among the 5,209 persons in the original cohort. The necessary assumptions about the cause and timing of unwitnessed deaths were made in a manner likely to diminish the possibility of detecting an increased incidence of sudden cardiac death during the morning. In the Framingham study, analyses using these assumptions reveal a significant circadian variation (p less than 0.01) in occurrence of sudden cardiac death (n = 429), with a peak incidence from 7 to 9 AM and a decreased incidence from 9 AM to 1 PM. Risk of sudden cardiac death was at least 70% higher during the peak period than was the average risk during other times of the day. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding in other populations, to collect data regarding medications and to determine activity immediately before sudden cardiac death. Investigation of physiologic changes occurring during the period of increased incidence of sudden cardiac death may provide increased insight into its causes and suggest possible means of prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91027-7

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willich, S. N., Levy, D., Rocco, M. B., Tofler, G. H., Stone, P. H., & Muller, J. E.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Willich, Stefan N.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-10
Volume
60
Issue
10
Pages
801-806
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085834180
Cited by
653
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 19
FWCI
17.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Keywords
sudden cardiac death, circadian variation, time of day, Framingham Heart Study, mortality, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Death, Sudden, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review