Cited by 201Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Development of cholinergic innervation in the hippocampal formation of the rat

Open access
Matthews, Dee Ann, Nadler, J.Victor, Lynch, Gary S., Cotman, Carl W.·1974·Developmental Biology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0012-1606(74)90196-1

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Around birth, the numerous cholinergic projections arising from the basal forebrain nuclei innervate the primary cortical regions where they influence cortical ultrastructure.

    “Around birth, the numerous cholinergic projections arising from the basal forebrain nuclei innervate the primary cortical regions where they influence cortical ultrastructure [210–213].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [212]

    The Introduction identifies a cholinergic pathway from the septum to the rat hippocampus, and the Histochemical section reports that its detectable innervation develops largely after birth. The paper studies the hippocampal formation, not primary cortical regions, and does not show that these projections influence cortical ultrastructure. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. BLACKSTAD, T. W. (1967). Cortical grey matter-a correlation of light and electron microscopic data. In "The Neuron" (H. Hyden, ed.). pp. 49-118. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  2. GLENNER, G. G. (1965). Enzyme Histochemistry. In "Neurochemistry" (C. W. M. Adams, ed.), pp. 109-160. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  3. MOSKO, S., LYNCH, G. S., and COTMAN, C. W. (1973). Distribution of the septal projection to the hip- pocampal formation of the rat. J. Comp. Neural. In press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matthews, D. A., Nadler, J. V., Lynch, G. S., & Cotman, C. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1974-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
130-141
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1569690226
Cited by
201
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 19691)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
cholinergic innervation, hippocampal formation, acetylcholinesterase activity, postnatal development, fimbria, dentate gyrus, stratum oriens, rat brain development
MeSH terms
Acetylcholinesterase, Animals, Hippocampus, Histocytochemistry, Parasympathetic Nervous System, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review