Cited by 464Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthGastroesophageal reflux and treatments

Altered small bowel motility in irritable bowel syndrome is correlated with symptoms

Open access
Kellow, John E., Phillips, Sidney F.·1987·Gastroenterology

Abstract

The pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been related more to dysmotility of the colon than to abnormalities of the small intestine. To look for small bowel abnormalities, we recorded ultraluminal pressures in 16 patients with IBS. All patients complained of abdominal pain, and diarrhea (n = 8) or constipation (n = 8) were also prominent symptoms. Comparable studies were performed on 16 age-matched controls. The observations include diurnal and nocturnal fasting recordings and the response to a fatty meal. Periodicities of the interdigestive migrating myoelectric complexes were shorter in IBS (p less than 0.05); this was due to much shorter diurnal cycles in patients with diarrhea (77 +/- 10 min) than those with constipation (118 +/- 15 min) or controls (113 +/- 10 min, both p less than 0.05). All groups exhibited circadian changes, with nocturnal cycles being more frequent. Two specific patterns of small bowel motor activity were more common in IBS--ileal propulsive waves and clusters of jejunal pressure activity (both p less than 0.05 compared to controls). Moreover, cramping abdominal pain was usually noted in IBS when ileal motility was propulsive; jejunal bursts were also sometimes associated with abdominal symptoms. We conclude that motility of the small intestine is modified in some patients with IBS and that certain motor patterns are related to their symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90620-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • So far, randomised controlled trials have not confirmed symptom generation by a specific food.

    “Although randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have confirmed that dietary modification can affect IBS symptoms, so far, they have not confirmed symptom generation by a specific food.”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Test Meals section describes a standardized high-fat meal used while recording motility, and the Discussion links abdominal pain to intestinal motor patterns. Neither passage assesses randomized controlled trials or whether a specific food has been confirmed to generate IBS symptoms; searches for dietary modification and food trials found no such assessment in our copy. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • FODMAPs have fermentative and osmotic effects, which may contribute to symptoms in some patients.

    “They have fermentative and osmotic effects, which may contribute to symptoms in some patients. 34”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Test Meals section describes a meal used to measure motility, and the Discussion links intestinal motor patterns with symptoms. Neither passage addresses FODMAPs or their fermentative and osmotic effects; searches for those mechanisms found no supporting passage in our copy. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Randomised controlled trials have confirmed that dietary modification can affect IBS symptoms.

    “Although randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have confirmed that dietary modification can affect IBS symptoms, so far, they have not confirmed symptom generation by a specific food.”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Test Meals section describes a high-fat meal used to measure motility, not a randomized trial of dietary modification. The Discussion mentions food as a stimulus for IBS symptoms, but our copy does not report RCTs confirming that dietary changes affect symptoms. Searched for randomized trials, dietary modification, food, and meal-related symptoms; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Switz DM. What the gastroenterologist does al1 day. Gastro- enterology 1976;70:1048-50.
  2. Chaudhary NA, Truelove SC. The irritable colon syndrome. Q J Med 1962;31:307-22.
  3. Manning AP, Thompson WG, Heaton KW, Morris AF. To- wards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel. Br Med J 1978;2:653-4.
  4. Connell AM. The motility of the pelvic colon. 11. Paradoxical motility in diarrhea and constipation. Gut 1962;3:342-8.
  5. Wangel AG, Deller DJ. Intestinal motility in man. 111. Mecha- nisms of constipation and diarrhea with particular reference to the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1965;48: 69-83.
  6. Snape WJ Jr, Carlson GM, Cohen S. Colonic myoelectrical activity in the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1976;70:326-30.
  7. Snape WJ Jr, Carlson GM, Matarazzo SA, et al. Evidente that abnormal myoelectrical activity produces colonic motor dys- function in the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology i977;72:383-7.
  8. Taylor 1, Darby C, Hammond P. Comparison of rectosigmoid myoelectrical activity in the irritable colon syndrome during relapses and remissions. Gut 1978;19:923-9.
  9. Bueno L, Fioramonti J, Ruckebusch Y, Frexinos J, Coulom P. Evaluation of colonic myoelectrical activity in health and functional disorders. Gut 1980;21:480-5.
  10. Lasser RB, Bond JH, Levitt MD. The role of intestinal gas in functional abdominal pain. N Eng1 J Med 1975;293:524-6.
  11. Whorwell PJ, Clouter C, Smith CL. Esophageal motility in the irritable bowel syndrome. Br Med J 1981;1:1101-3.
  12. Moriarty KJ, Dawson AM. Functional abdominal pain: further evidente that whole gut is affected. Br Med J 1982;284: 1670-2. 16. 17. 18. 19.
  13. Cann PA, Read NW, Brown C, Hobson N, Holdsworth CD. Irritable bowel syndrome: relationship of disorders in the transit of a single solid meal to symptom patterns. Gut i983;24:405-11.
  14. Jian R, Najean Y, Bernier JJ. Measurement of intestinal pro- gression of a meal and its residues in normal subjects and patients with functional diarrhea by a dual isotope technique. Gut 1984;25:728-31.
  15. Horowitz L, Farrar JT. Intraluminal smal1 intestinal pressures in normal patients and in patients with functional gastroin- testinal disorders. Gastroenterology 1962;42:455-64.
  16. Holdstock DJ, Misiewicz JJ, Waller SL. Observations on the mechanism of abdominal pain. Gut 1969;10:19-31.
  17. Szurszewski JH. A migrating electric complex of the canine smal1 intestine. Am J Physiol 1969;217:1757-63. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32.
  18. Kingham JGC, Brown R, Colson R, Clark ML. Jejunal motility in patients with functional abdominal pain. Gut 1984;25: 375-80.
  19. Borody T, Byrnes D, Bel1 D, Henderson L. The migrating motor complex; its relation to circulating CCK, motilin, and pancreatic polypeptide in irritable bowel patients and in controls (abstr]. Clin Res 1984;32:23A.
  20. Kellow J, Borody TJ, Phillips SF, Tucker RL, Haddad AC. Human interdigestive motility: variations in patterns from esophagus to colon. Gastroenterology 1986;91:386-95.
  21. Quigley EMM, Borody TJ, Phillips SF, Wienbeck M, Tucker RL, Haddad A. Motility of the terminal ileum and ileocecal sphincter in healthy humans. Gastroenterology 1984;87: 857-66.
  22. Kerlin P, Phillips SF. Variability of motility of the ileum and jejunum in healthy humans. Gastroenterology 1982;82: 694-700.
  23. Latimer PR. Functional gastrointestinal disorders. A behav- ioral medicine approach. New York: Springer, 1983.
  24. Colligan RC, Osborne D, Swenson WM, Offord KP. The aging MMPI: development of contemporary norms. Mayo Clin Proc 1984;59:377-90.
  25. Arndorfer RC, Stef JJ, Dodds WJ, Lineham JH, Hogan WJ. Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal ma- nometry. Gastroenterology 1977;73:23-7.
  26. Kerlin P, Tucker R, Phillips SF. Rapid intubation of the ileocolonic region of man. Aust NZ J Med 1983;13:591.
  27. Kumar D, Wingate DL. The human MMC moves slowly by night (abstr). Gastroenterology 1985;88:1459. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44.
  28. Summers RW, Anuras S, Green J. Jejunal mamometry patterns in health, partial intestinal obstruction and pseudo-obstruc- tion. Gastroenterology 1983;85:1290-300.
  29. Code C, Rogers AG, Schlegel J, Hightower NC, Bargen JA. Motility patterns in the terminal ileum: studies on two patients with ulcerative colitis and iliac stomas. Gastroenter- ology 1957;32:651-65.
  30. Quigley EMM, Phillips SF, Dent J. Distinctive patterns of interdigestive motility at the canine ileocolonic junction. Gastroenterology 1984;87:83644.
  31. Kruis W, Azpiroz F, Phillips SF. Contractile patterns and transit of fluid in canine terminal ileum. Am J Physiol 1985;249:G264-70.
  32. Mathias JR, Carlson GM, DiMarino AJ, Bertiger G, Morton HE, Cohen S. Intestinal myoelectric activity in response to live Vitrio cholerase and cholera enterotoxin. J Clin Invest 1976;58:91-6.
  33. Mathias JR, Martin JL, Burns TW, Carlson GM, Shields RP. Ricinoleic acid effects on the electrical activity of the smal1 intestine in rabbits. J Clin Invest 1978;61:640-4.
  34. Fleckenstein P, Oigaard A. Electrical spike activity in the human smal1 intestine. A multiple electrode study of fasting diurnal variations. Dig Dis Sci 1978;23:776-80.
  35. Fleckenstein P, Bueno L, Fioramonti J, Ruckebusch Y. Minute rhythm of electrical spike bursts of the smal1 intestine in different species. Am J Physiol 1982;242:G654-9.
  36. Wingate DL. Backwards and forwards with the migrating complex. Dig Dis Sci 1981;26:641-64.
  37. Sarna SK. Cyclic motor activity: migrating motor complex: 1985. Gastroenterology 1985;89:894-913.
  38. Wood JD. Enteric neurophysiology. Am J Physiol 1984; 247:G585-98.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kellow, J. E., & Phillips, S. F.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-06
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
1885-1893
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W130502936
Cited by
464
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01am032121-03, 3p30am034988-01s1)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-585)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, small intestine motility, migrating motor complex, abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Colonic Diseases, Functional, Female, Food, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Ileum, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review