Cited by 589Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStress Responses and CortisolAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Sex differences in animal tests of anxiety

Johnston, Amanda L., File, Sandra E.·1991·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

To explore further the meaning of sexually dimorphic behavior in the open-field test, male and female hooded Lister rats were tested in three tests of anxiety. In the social interaction test, the social interaction scores of the female rats were lower and did not increase as readily following familiarization to the apparatus as those of the male rats. In the elevated plus-maze test, female rats showed a reduced aversion to the open arms compared to male rats; and in a modified Vogel conflict test, the punished licking rates of the female rats were lower than those of the male rats. It is concluded that the behavior of male and female rats differs in these tests, but that firm conclusions concerning sex differences in anxiety levels cannot be made because all three tests did not lead to predictions which were in the same direction. It is also suggested that cautious interpretation is necessary because these tests may measure different variables in male and female rats and they may not be valid tests of anxiety for female rats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90039-q

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnston, A. L., & File, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
File, Sandra E.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-02
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
245-250
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992674129
Cited by
589
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 22
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
sex differences, anxiety, sexually dimorphic behavior, Lister hooded rats, open field test, social interaction, elevated plus maze, Vogel conflict test, punishment, female rats, test validity
MeSH terms
Animals, Appetitive Behavior, Arousal, Avoidance Learning, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Male, Motor Activity, Orientation, Rats, Inbred Strains, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review