Cited by 204Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorMemory and Neural MechanismsPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Effects of neonatal decortication on the social play of juvenile rats

Panksepp, Jaak, Normansell, Larry, Cox, James F., Siviy, Stephen M.·1994·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The effects of radical neonatal decortication on the social play of juvenile rats, as well as the effects of neonatal ablation of frontal or parietal cortex, were examined in this series of experiments. When total decorticates were tested in like-lesioned pairs, the frequency of pinning was reduced by about 50% and their average pin durations were shorter. Nevertheless, the play of decorticates appeared essentially normal in general appearance, and did not differ from controls in a measure of overall play vigor using an electronic activity platform. Further, there were no differences in pin frequencies when controls and decorticates were paired together in cross-lesion testing. Separate tests of play solicitation behaviors did not detect any differences between controls and decorticates suggesting that play motivation was essentially intact after decortication. No deficits in pinning resulted from frontal ablations; however, pin durations were shorter in like-lesion testing. In cross-lesion testing, there was an increase in dorsal contacts and a trend toward shortening of pin durations. Parietal aspirations resulted in a 65% reduction in pin frequency, without substantially altering dorsal contacts. Anesthetization of the anterior surface of the animal's back with xylocaine reduced pinning in controls but eliminated pinning in parietals. Although the results generally indicate little participation of the neocortex in the instigation of rough-and-tumble play, the reliable nume…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90285-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neonatal lesions of the mPFC impair play in a variety of ways, largely resulting in a disruption of the animal's play structure and ability to respond to play initiations.

    “As noted previously, neonatal lesions of the mPFC impair play in a variety of ways, largely resulting in a disruption the animal’s play structure and ability to respond to play initiations (Panksepp et al., 1994; Bell et al., 2009).”

    From Developmental origins of sex differences in the neural circuitry of play (2020) · cites this paper as Panksepp et al., 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panksepp, J., Normansell, L., Cox, J. F., & Siviy, S. M.
Affiliations
Bowling Green State University (US)
Corresponding author
Panksepp, Jaak
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-09
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
429-443
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034369724
Cited by
204
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r15hd030387-01)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1 R15 HD 30387)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
social play, rough-and-tumble play, young rats, neocortex, play motivation, somatosensory sensitivity
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Appetitive Behavior, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebral Decortication, Dextroamphetamine, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Fenfluramine, Frontal Lobe, Lidocaine, Male, Morphine, Motor Activity, Naloxone, Parietal Lobe, Play and Playthings, Scopolamine, Social Behavior, Stereotyped Behavior, Weaning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review