The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Utterback, 1974, Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology, Science, 622
- Achilladelis, 1971, Vol. 1, 66
- Utterback, 1971, The Process of Innovation: A Study of the Origin and Development of Ideas for New Scientific Instruments, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 124, 10.1109/TEM.1971.6448350 · DOI
- The Conference Board, 1973, Evaluating New Product Proposals, 63
Cited by
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · Cited by 3,184
Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth
Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.807 · Cited by 1,341
West, J. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00052-0 · Cited by 854
Managing Co-creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation
Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12087 · Cited by 518
A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets
Dahlander, L., & Wallin, M. W. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.011 · Cited by 470
New, technology-based firms in innovation networks symplectic and generative impacts
Autio, E. (1997) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(96)00906-7 · Cited by 242
Innovation Policy for Grand Challenges. An Economic Geography Perspective
Coenen, L., Hansen, T., & Rekers, J. V. (2015) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12231 · Cited by 174
User and third-party involvement in developing medical equipment innovations
Biemans, W. G. (1991) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/0166-4972(91)90032-y · Cited by 166
Implementation research: state of the art and future directions
Linton, J. D. (2002) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(01)00075-x · Cited by 126
Informal boundary-spanning communication in the innovation process: an empirical study
Conway, S. (1995) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537329508524216 · Cited by 102
Exploring passion in hobby-related entrepreneurship. Evidence from Italian cases
Milanesi, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.020 · Cited by 86
Horizontal Innovation Networks - by and for Users
von Hippel, E. (2002) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.328900 · Cited by 70
Self-citationPreißner, S., Raasch, C., & Schweisfurth, T. (2024) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12709 · Cited by 28
Innovation strategies in the enzyme industry
Bruce, M., & Rodgus, G. (1991) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1991.tb01325.x · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- von Hippel, E.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1976-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 212-239
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3125566910
- Cited by
- 1,017
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
