Cited by 182Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of a D1 and a D2 dopamine antagonist on the self-administration of cocaine and piribedil by Rhesus monkeys

Woolverton, William L.·1986·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

Rhesus monkeys were surgically prepared with chronic intravenous catheters and allowed to self-administer the indirect dopamine (DA) agonist cocaine (0.03 or 0.1 mg/kg/inj) or the direct D2 agonist piribedil (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg/inj) on a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of drug delivery during daily 2 hour experimental sessions. When responding was stable, they were injected IV with SCH 23390, a selective D1 antagonist (0.003-0.3 mg/kg, 30 min pre-session) or pimozide, a selective D2 antagonist (0.003-0.3 mg/kg, 2 hours pre-session). Intermediate doses of pimozide generally increased self-administration of cocaine or piribedil, though increases in piribedil self-administration were more reliable. In contrast, intermediate doses of SCH 23390 either did not affect or decreased cocaine and piribedil self-administration. High doses of each antagonist decreased the rate of self-administration of each compound and produced catalepsy. The selective increase in responding maintained by cocaine or piribedil following pimozide pretreatment suggests a role for a D2-like receptor in psychomotor stimulant self-administration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90553-8

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Goldberg, 1979, Peripheral pre- and post-synaptic dopamine receptors: Are they different from dopamine receptors in the CNS?, Commun Psychopharmacol, 3, 447

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Woolverton, W. L.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Woolverton, William L.
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
531-535
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977382144
Cited by
181
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA00250)
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
cocaine self-administration, piribedil, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, dopamine antagonists, pimozide, SCH 23390, psychostimulants, rhesus monkeys, catalepsy, fixed-ratio schedules
MeSH terms
Animals, Benzazepines, Cocaine, Drug Interactions, Female, Macaca mulatta, Male, Pimozide, Piperazines, Piribedil, Receptors, Dopamine, Self Administration, Antipsychotic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review