The effects of a D1 and a D2 dopamine antagonist on behavior maintained by cocaine or food
Abstract
The purpose of the present experiment was to determine whether a D1 or a D2 dopamine antagonist could alter responding maintained by cocaine at doses that did not affect responding maintained by food. Rhesus monkeys were trained to press a lever in daily experimental sessions under a 3 component multiple schedule of reinforcement. In the first and third components, food was available under a fixed-ratio 30/time-out 2 min (FR30/TO 2) schedule. In the second component, cocaine was available under identical schedule conditions. Each component lasted 15 minutes and there was a 15-minute TO between components. When behavior was stable, rates of responding for injections of saline or several doses of cocaine were determined by making each of these solutions available in the second component for at least 4 sessions. After dose-response determinations for cocaine had been determined, a dose of cocaine that maintained maximal rates of responding was available in daily sessions. When behavior was again stable in all 3 components, monkeys were injected daily before the session with each of several doses of the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 or the D2 antagonist pimozide for the same number of sessions that had been required for responding to decline to low levels when the monkeys were allowed to self-administer saline. Both antagonists caused a dose-related decrease in responding for both cocaine and food. Each antagonist decreased responding for food at the same doses that decreased responding for cocaine. Thus both a D1 and a D2 dopamine antagonist decreased behavior maintained by cocaine but only at doses that also decreased behavior maintained by another reinforcer, food.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If cocaine is administered with D2R-like antagonists, it loses its reinforcing effects.
“Furthermore, if cocaine is administered with D2R-like antagonists, it loses its reinforcing effects (Woolverton and Virus 1989; Bachtell et al 2005; Claytor et al 2006; Peng et al 2009).”
From The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction (2012) · cites this paper as Woolverton and Virus 1989
Cites
The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics
McMahon, F. G. (1986) · American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.673 · Cited by 2,224 · see citing works
Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis
Wise, R. A. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00010372 · Cited by 1,022 · see citing works
de Wit, H., & Wise, R. A. (1977) · Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0081662 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULE OF COCAINE REINFORCEMENT: EFFECT OF DOSE AND INFUSION DURATION<sup>1</sup>
Balster, R. L., & Schuster, C. R. (1973) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1973.20-119 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
The D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 increases cocaine self-administration in the rat
Koob, G. F., Le, H. T., & Creese, I. (1987) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(87)90451-4 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey.
Johanson, C. E., & Schuster, C. R. (1975) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)30186-2 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Intravenous self-administration of dopamine receptor agonists by rhesus monkeys.
Woolverton, W. L., Goldberg, L. I., & Ginos, J. Z. (1984) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)21719-0 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationWoolverton, W. L. (1986) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/0091-3057(86)90553-8 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationAmphetamine-type reinforcement by dopaminergic agonists in the rat
Yokel, R. A., & Wise, R. A. (1978) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00427393 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
The effects of chlorpromazine on psychomotor stimulant self-administration in the Rhesus monkey
Wilson, M. C., & Schuster, C. R. (1972) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00422098 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Progressive ratio and fixed ratio schedules of cocaine-maintained responding in baboons
Griffiths, R. R., Bradford, L. D., & Brady, J. V. (1979) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00433038 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Antagonism of the amphetamine cue by both classical and atypical antipsychotic drugs
Nielsen, E. B., & Jepsen, S. A. (1985) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0014-2999(85)90753-8 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Herling, S., & Woods, J. H. (1980) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)32180-4 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Effects of antipsychotic compounds in rhesus monkeys given a choice between cocaine and food
Woolverton, W. L., & Balster, R. L. (1981) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/0376-8716(81)90088-0 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationKleven, M. S., Anthony, E., Goldberg, L. I., et al. (1988) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00181961 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The effect of haloperidol on cocaine self-administration is augmented with repeated administrations
Roberts, D. C. S., & Vickers, G. (1987) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00207247 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
CHLORPROMAZINE-AND HALOPERIDOL-INDUCED CHANGES IN SOME BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF COCAINE AND AMPHETAMINE
Woods, J. H., Herling, S., & Winger, G. D. (1978) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-8322-7.50190-4 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
PHARMACOLOGICAL MODIFICATION OF COCAINE AND APOMORPHINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION IN THE SQUIRREL MONKEY
GILL, C. A., Holz, W. C., Zirkle, C. L., & Hill, H. F. (1978) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-8322-7.50189-8 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Naltrexone effects on food- and codeine-maintained responding in rhesus monkeys
Herling, S. (1981) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0014-2999(81)90143-6 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dopamine functions in appetitive and defensive behaviours
Blackburn, J. R., Pfaus, J. G., & Phillips, A. G. (1992) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(92)90018-a · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Burkett, J. P., & Young, L. J. (2012) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2794-x · Cited by 307 · see citing works
“Furthermore , if cocaine is administered with D2R - like antagonists , it loses its reinforcing effects ( Woolverton and Virus 1989 ; Bachtell et al .”
Addictive drugs as reinforcers: multiple partial actions on memory systems
WHITE, N. M. (1996) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1996.tb03586.x · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Controversies in translational research: drug self-administration.
Haney, M., & Spealman, R. (2008) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1079-x · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Caine, S. B., Negus, S. S., Mello, N. K., Patel, S., Bristow, L., Kulagowski, J., Vallone, D., Saiardi, A., & Borrelli, E. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-07-02977.2002 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Opponent Process Model and Psychostimulant Addiction
Koob, G. F., Caine, S. B., Parsons, L., Markou, A., & Weiss, F. (1997) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00438-8 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Czoty, P., Morgan, D., Shannon, E., Gage, H. D., & Nader, M. (2004) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-003-1752-z · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Claytor, R., Lile, J. A., & Nader, M. A. (2006) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2006.03.007 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Woolverton, W. L., & Virus, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 691-697
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025951831
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA00250)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- dopamine antagonists, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, cocaine self-administration, food reinforcement, rhesus monkeys, SCH 23390, pimozide, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Benzazepines, Cocaine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Feeding Behavior, Female, Macaca mulatta, Male, Pimozide, Receptors, Dopamine, Reinforcement, Psychology, Self Administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
