Cited by 186Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySmoking Behavior and Cessation

The actions of nicotine and cocaine in a mouse model of anxiety

Costall, Brenda, Elizabeth Kelly, M., Naylor, Robert J., Onaivi, Emmanuel S.·1989·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

The acute administration of nicotine (0.01-1.0 mg/kg IP) to the mouse increased the time spent and rearings and line crossings in the aversive brightly illuminated white area of a two compartment white/black test box, with a corresponding decrease in the black. This profile of change was maintained during twice daily administration (0.1 mg/kg IP) for 14 days. Eight to 96 hr following withdrawal of nicotine (14-day treatment), the behavioural profile was reversed to a preference for the black area: by 240 hr values had returned to control levels. In contrast to the effects of nicotine, an acute injection of cocaine (0.1-10 mg/kg IP) exacerbated the aversive response to the white area. However, similarly to nicotine, the administration of cocaine (1.0 mg/kg IP) twice daily for 14 days reduced the aversion to the white area and exacerbated the response following cocaine withdrawal. The effects of nicotine and cocaine to reduce and enhance responsiveness to the aversive properties of the white area are discussed in terms of an anxiolytic and anxiogenic response and the possibility of a serotonergic involvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90450-4

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nicotine withdrawal can elicit anxiety-like behaviors in mice.

    “Nicotine withdrawal can elicit anxiety-like behaviors in mice [190–192].”

    From Mechanistic insights into nicotine withdrawal (2011) · cites this paper as [190]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costall, B., Elizabeth Kelly, M., Naylor, R. J., & Onaivi, E. S.
Affiliations
University of Bradford (GB)
Corresponding author
Naylor, Robert J.
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-05
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
197-203
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084436311
Cited by
186
References
42
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
nicotine, cocaine, anxiety, aversive behavior, nicotine withdrawal, cocaine withdrawal, anxiolytic effects, anxiogenic effects, self-administration
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Cocaine, Discrimination, Psychological, Disease Models, Animal, Light, Male, Mice, Inbred Strains, Nicotine, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review