Cited by 87Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A comparison of anxiolytic and nonanxiolytic agents in the shock-probe/burying test for anxiolytics

Treit, Dallas·1990·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

The effects of IP midazolam (1.0-3.0 mg/kg), pentobarbital (10-20 mg/kg), ethanol (500-2000 mg/kg), scopolamine (0.05-1.25 mg/kg), chlorpromazine (0.5-5.0 mg/kg), yohimbine (0.5-2.0 mg/kg), and pentylene-tetrazol (5.0-20.0 mg/kg) were compared in the shock-probe/burying test. Consistent with results found previously for chlordiazepoxide and buspirone, the anxiolytic agents midazolam and pentobarbital decreased rats' burying behavior toward a continuously electrified (2 mA) shock-probe, and increased the number of contact-induced probe-shocks rats received. A concurrent decrease in probe-burying and increase in probe-shocks was not reliably observed after ethanol, scopolamine, chlorpromazine, yohimbine, or pentylenetetrazol. Although most of these nonanxiolytic agents produced some suppression of burying behavior at high doses, none of these drugs induced a significant increase in probe-shocks. In fact, pentylenetetrazol, which is believed to be anxiogenic, produced a significant reduction in probe-shocks. Yohimbine, another putative anxiogenic agent, was not active in the present test. In summary, concurrent increases in probe-shocks and decreases in probe-burying seem to be characteristic effects of clinically useful anxiolytic agents, which distinguish them from nonanxiolytic agents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90151-7

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treit, D.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Treit, Dallas
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-05
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
203-205
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035841543
Cited by
86
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anxiolytics, midazolam, pentobarbital, ethanol, scopolamine, chlorpromazine, yohimbine, pentylenetetrazole, burying behavior, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Male, Rats, Inbred Strains, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review