The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competition, cooperation, and innovation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Self-citation
Cited by
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique
Stam, E. (2015) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 · Cited by 2,406
Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation
Rothaermel, F. T. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.180 · Cited by 1,114
Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B.-J. (. (2011) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.009 · Cited by 1,044
Cocreation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software1
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410417 · Cited by 794
Reflections on “Profiting from Innovation”
Teece, D. J. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.009 · Cited by 733
Self-citationAre Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building
Almeida, P., Song, J., & Grant, R. M. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.2.147.534 · Cited by 442
Achieving Cooperation in Multiparty Alliances: a Social Dilemma Approach to Partnership Management
Zeng, M., & Chen, X.-P. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10899383 · Cited by 343
Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: a conceptual framework
Pitelis, C. (2012) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dts008 · Cited by 253
Information technology adoption in SMEs: an integrated framework
Nguyen, T. H. (2009) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research · doi:10.1108/13552550910944566 · Cited by 238
Staber, U. (2001) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343400125106 · Cited by 201
Beyond products: new strategic imperatives for developing competencies in dynamic environments
Fowler, S. W., King, A. W., Marsh, S. J., & Victor, B. (2000) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/s0923-4748(00)00029-1 · Cited by 127
Business group characteristics and affiliated firm innovation: The case of Taiwan
Hsieh, T.-J., Yeh, R.-S., & Chen, Y.-J. (2010) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.12.018 · Cited by 110
Rowley, T. J., Baum, J. A. C., Shipilov, A. V., Greve, H. R., & Rao, H. (2004) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.1201 · Cited by 76
Castellani, D. (2002) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/26.1.1 · Cited by 68
Coordination dynamics between fuel cell and battery technologies in the transition to clean cars
Dugoua, E., & Dumas, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2318605121 · Cited by 19
Is sibling rivalry good or bad for high technology organizations?
Khoja, F. (2008) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2008.06.006 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Teece, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1543985151
- Cited by
- 1,379
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.