Cited by 201Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDNA Repair MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increased levels of DNA breaks in cerebral cortex of Alzheimer's disease patients

Open access
Mullaart, Erik, Boerrigter, Michael E.T.I., Ravid, Rivka, Swaab, Dick F., Vijg, Jan·1990·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that Alzheimer's disease (AD) is caused by an accumulation of damage in DNA due to defective DNA-repair (21). Attempts to test this hypothesis by determining the activity of DNA-repair systems in nonneuronal cells from AD patients and controls so far provided conflicting results. An alternative approach is the direct comparison of DNA-damage levels in neuronal tissue of AD patients and controls. In the present study we assayed the level of DNA breaks and alkali-labile sites in cerebral cortex tissue samples from AD patients and controls obtained from rapid autopsies. Our data on 11 AD patients and 8 control subjects indicate an at least two-fold higher level of DNA damage in cortex of AD patients as compared to controls.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0197-4580(90)90542-8

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kinsella, 1987, Alzheimer's disease fibroblasts have normal repair of methylmethane sulfate-induced DNA damage determined by the alkaline elution technique, Neurology, 37, 166

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Mullaart, E., Boerrigter, M. E. T. I., Ravid, R., Swaab, D. F., & Vijg, J.
Affiliations
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Vijg, Jan
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-05
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
169-173
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072092279
Cited by
201
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, DNA damage, DNA strand breaks, cerebral cortex, alkali-labile sites, DNA repair, neuronal DNA damage, neuropathology
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebral Cortex, DNA Damage, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review