Cited by 266Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePediatric Pain Management Techniques

Active and passive coping strategies in chronic pain patients

Snow-Turek, Lynn A., Norris, Margaret P., Tan, Gabriel·1996·Pain

Abstract

This study assessed the validity of active and passive coping dimensions in chronic pain patients (n = 76) using the Coping Strategies Questionnaire and the Vanderbilt Pain Management Inventory. The validity of active and passive coping dimensions was supported; passive coping was strongly related to general psychological distress and depression, and active coping was associated with activity level and was inversely related to psychological distress. In addition, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire was found to be a more psychometrically sound measure of active and passive coping than the Vanderbilt Pain Management Inventory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00190-5

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the Communal Coping Model, catastrophizing can be conceptualized as a coping strategy that activates the individual's social environment by soliciting support or empathy.

    “Within the Communal Coping Model framework, catastrophizing can be conceptualized as a coping strategy that activates the individual’s social environment by soliciting support or empathy 124, 294, 341, 342.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snow-Turek, L. A., Norris, M. P., & Tan, G.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Norris, Margaret P.
Venue
Pain
Published
1996-03
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
455-462
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979784670
Cited by
266
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, coping strategies, active coping, passive coping, Coping Strategies Questionnaire, psychological distress, depression, activity level, psychometric validity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Characteristics, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review