Cited by 96Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Treatment

Pain beliefs, coping, and adjustment to chronic pain

Geisser, Michael E., Robinson, Michael E., Riley, Joseph L.·1999·Pain Forum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1082-3174(99)70001-2

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients whose partners have avoidant and anxious attachment styles are more likely to report greater pain and lower well-being.

    “Patients with partners showing avoidant and anxious attachment styles are more likely to report increased pain and decreased well-being 103, 124–127.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geisser, M. E., Robinson, M. E., & Riley, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Michael E.
Venue
Pain Forum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
161-168
ISSN
1082-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144446486
Cited by
96
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pain Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic pain, pain beliefs, pain coping, maladaptive coping, adaptive coping, self-efficacy, cognitive-behavioral intervention, mediation model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review