Cited by 107Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesGastrointestinal motility and disordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

A typology of pain coping strategies in pediatric patients with chronic abdominal pain

Open access
Walker, Lynn S., Baber, Kari Freeman, Garber, Judy, Smith, Craig A.·2008·Pain

Abstract

This study aimed to identify clinically meaningful profiles of pain coping strategies used by youth with chronic abdominal pain (CAP). Participants (n=699) were pediatric patients (ages 8-18 years) and their parents. Patients completed the Pain Response Inventory (PRI) and measures of somatic and depressive symptoms, disability, pain severity and pain efficacy, and perceived competence. Parents rated their children's pain severity and coping efficacy. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on the 13 PRI subscales identified pain coping profiles in Sample 1 (n=311) that replicated in Sample 2 (n=388). Evidence was found of external validity and distinctiveness of the profiles. The findings support a typology of pain coping that reflects the quality of patients' pain mastery efforts and interpersonal relationships associated with pain coping. Results are discussed in relation to developmental processes, attachment styles, and treatment implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.038

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, L. S., Baber, K. F., Garber, J., & Smith, C. A.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Walker, Lynn S.
Venue
Pain
Published
2008-07-15
Volume
137
Issue
2
Pages
266-275
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980438413
Cited by
107
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt Digestive Diseases Research Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK058404, P30DK058404)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD015052, HD 15052, R01HD023264, HD23264)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic abdominal pain, pain coping, coping profiles, pediatric patients, coping self-efficacy, perceived competence, attachment styles, somatic symptoms, depressive symptoms, pain intensity, disability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Aging, Attitude to Health, Child, Chronic Disease, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Intractable Pain, Pediatrics, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Reproducibility of Results, Abdominal Pain, Cluster Analysis, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review