Cited by 71Heat Transfer and OptimizationRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesHeat Transfer Mechanisms

Frosting performance of tube fin heat exchangers with wavy and corrugated fins

Kondepudi, Sekhar N., O'Neal, Dennis L.·1991·Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0894-1777(91)90040-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 5 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kondepudi, S. N., & O'Neal, D. L.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Kondepudi, Sekhar N.
Venue
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-09
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
613-618
ISSN
0894-1777 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006801031
Cited by
71
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer Mechanisms
Keywords
frost growth, finned tube heat exchanger, wavy fins, corrugated fins, frost accumulation, pressure drop, energy transfer coefficient, air humidity, fin spacing, latent heat transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review