Cited by 48Heat Transfer and OptimizationHeat Transfer MechanismsRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies

An experimental study on the air side heat transfer performance of the perforated fin-tube heat exchangers under the frosting conditions

Liu, Xiaoqin, Yu, Jianlin, Yan, Gan·2020·Applied Thermal Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114634

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, X., Yu, J., & Yan, G.
Affiliations
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yu, Jianlin
Venue
Applied Thermal Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
166
Pages
114634
ISSN
1359-4311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2983078688
Cited by
47
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Thermal Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Keywords
perforated fins, finned tube heat exchanger, air-side heat transfer, frost formation, frost thickness, heat transfer coefficient, empirical correlations, J-factor, air conditioning heat exchangers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review