Cited by 225Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 215 of the 219 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress

Karpicke, Jeffrey D.·2017·Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9

Cites

215 of 215 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 219 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Karpicke, J.D., 2017. Concept mapping. In: B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Sage Publications, (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 225

Metadata

Authors
Karpicke, J. D.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Karpicke, Jeffrey D.
Venue
Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2017
Pages
487-514
OpenAlex
W2604785529
Cited by
223
References
219
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5
FWCI
49.72
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Grantee Submission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
retrieval practice, educational psychology, learning outcomes, transfer of learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review