Cited by 42Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Neural ECM and synaptogenesis

Heikkinen, Anne, Pihlajaniemi, Taina, Faissner, Andreas, Yuzaki, Michisuke·2014·Progress in Brain Research

Abstract

Chemical synapses allow neurons to perform complex computations and regulate other systems of the body. At a chemical synapse, pre- and postsynaptic sites are separated by a small space (the synaptic cleft) and surrounded by astrocytes. The basement membrane (BM), a sheetlike, specialized extracellular matrix (ECM), is found ubiquitously in the PNS. It has become clear that the ECMs not only play a structural role but also serve as barriers and filters in the PNS and CNS. Moreover, proteoglycans and tenascin family proteins in the ECM regulate synapse formation and synaptic plasticity. Although CNS synapses lack the BMs, recent results indicate that the BM-associated collagens are also present in the CNS synaptic cleft and affect synaptogenesis in both the CNS and the PNS. The C1q domain-containing family proteins are important components of the CNS synaptic cleft in regulating synapse formation, maintenance, and the pruning process. The ECM is regarded as a crucial component of the tetrapartite synapse, consisting of pre- and postsynaptic neurons, astrocyte, and ECM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-63486-3.00002-5

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knockout mice deficient in PNN component tenascin-R have abnormal synapse formation and synaptic plasticity after injury.

    “Moreover, knockout mice deficient in PNN component tenascin-R have abnormal synapse formation and synaptic plasticity after injury [54, 57].”

    From The extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets in memory (2022) · cites this paper as [54]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heikkinen, A., Pihlajaniemi, T., Faissner, A., & Yuzaki, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Yuzaki, Michisuke
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2014
Volume
214
Pages
29-51
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2415352026
Cited by
42
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.83
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
extracellular matrix, synaptogenesis, basement membrane, astrocytes, synaptic cleft, proteoglycans, tenascin, synaptic plasticity, collagen, synaptic pruning, peripheral nervous system, central nervous system
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Extracellular Matrix, Nervous System, Neurons, Synapses, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review