Cited by 37Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

ACCEPTANCE, MINDFULNESS, VALUES, AND PSYCHOSIS: APPLYING ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT THERAPY (ACT) TO THE CHRONICALLY MENTALLY ILL

BACH, PATRICIA A., GAUDIANO, BRANDON, PANKEY, JULIEANN, HERBERT, JAMES D., HAYES, STEVEN C.·2006·Mindfulness-Based Treatment Approaches

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-012088519-0/50006-x

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BACH, P. A., GAUDIANO, B., PANKEY, J., HERBERT, J. D., & HAYES, S. C.
Venue
Mindfulness-Based Treatment Approaches
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2006
Pages
93-116
OpenAlex
W2487948715
Cited by
37
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.17
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, psychosis, chronic mental illness, mindfulness, values, acceptance, psychotherapy of psychosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review