Cited by 327Behavioral and Psychological StudiesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Dysfunctional control by client verbal behavior: The context of reason-giving

Open access
Zettle, Robert D., Hayes, Steven C.·1986·The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

Abstract

Dysfunctional control exerted by reason-giving in adult psychopathology is interpreted from a radical behavioral perspective. Verbal-social contingencies which support the establishment of reason-giving and its control over maladaptive actions are reviewed. A contextual approach to psychotherapy, comprehensive distancing, which attempts to weaken dysfunctional verbal control is described briefly. Data relevant to therapeutic process are presented. The overall results suggest that comprehensive distancing facilitates therapeutic change through a process consistent with a behavioral analysis of reason-giving. Suggestions for further research and radical behavioral approaches to psychotherapy are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03392813

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Believability of depressive thoughts mediated outcomes in ACT but not in CT.

    “Believability of depressive thoughts mediated outcomes in ACT but not CT (Hayes et al., 2006; Zettle & Hayes, 1986);”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Contextual Behavioral Science: Examining the Progress of a Distinctive Model of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as Zettle & Hayes, 1986

    The ATQ section reports a larger reduction in depressive-thought believability with comprehensive distancing than with cognitive therapy, and Related Research reports better depression outcomes for the distancing group. But the paper does not show that believability mediated outcomes in either group; it also reports that believability declined in both groups. The claim turns a tentative account of differing processes into a specific mediation finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some studies show mediation using processes assessed before outcome differences appear, while in other cases mediators were assessed concurrently with outcome.

    “For example, some studies show mediation using processes assessed before outcome differences are seen (e.g., Gifford et al., 2004; Lundgren et al., 2008; Zettle & Hayes, 1986, as reanalyzed in Hayes et al., 2006); in other cases the mediators were assessed concurrently with outcome.”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Contextual Behavioral Science: Examining the Progress of a Distinctive Model of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as Zettle & Hayes, 1986

    In Related Research, the paper reports a significant depression-outcome difference at follow-up; in ATQ, it reports a significant difference in thought believability at posttreatment. That supports the stated ordering of process and outcome differences for this study. The paper calls its process findings tentative, however, and does not report a mediation analysis; the cited reanalysis cannot be assessed from this paper's text. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The first two published ACT outcome studies directly compared ACT with cognitive therapy.

    “The first two published ACT outcome studies involved a direct comparison of ACT to cognitive therapy (CT; Zettle & Hayes, 1986; Zettle & Raines, 1989).”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Contextual Behavioral Science: Examining the Progress of a Distinctive Model of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as Zettle & Hayes, 1986

    The Related Research section describes a direct comparison of comprehensive distancing with two variants of cognitive therapy and briefly reports outcomes. It does not call the intervention ACT or establish that this and the separately cited study were the first two published ACT outcome studies; it says fuller outcome data would be presented elsewhere. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An ACT treatment group with depression demonstrated the most improvements in depression compared with cognitive restructuring alone and cognitive restructuring plus distancing.

    “Zettle and Hayes found that the ACT treatment group that contained patients with depression demonstrated the most improvements in depression compared with cognitive restructuring alone and cognitive restructuring plus distancing group [48].”

    From ClearMind Workshop: An ACT-based Intervention Tailored for Academic Procrastination among Computing Students (2024) · cites this paper as [48]

    In Related Research (page not given), the paper reports that clinically depressed women received comprehensive distancing, cognitive restructuring alone, or cognitive restructuring plus distancing, and that the comprehensive-distancing group showed the greatest improvement in interviewer-rated depression. It calls the treatment “comprehensive distancing,” not ACT, and combines the two cognitive-therapy groups for its reported outcome comparison rather than establishing a separate result against each one. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Zettle and Hayes (1986), ACT and CT did differ significantly when clients rated the believability of their depressogenic thoughts were they to occur (ATQ-B), a measure of cognitive defusion.

    “but did if clients were asked to rate the believability of these same thoughts were they to occur (the ''ATQ-B'')-a measure of cognitive defusion.”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes (2006) · cites this paper as Zettle and Hayes (1986)

    The ATQ section (page not available in our copy) reports significantly lower posttreatment ATQ-B believability scores for comprehensive distancing than for cognitive therapy (U = 12.5, p < .05). The paper calls the treatment comprehensive distancing, not ACT, and does not identify ATQ-B as a measure of cognitive defusion. Its reported follow-up difference was not statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. 0. (in press). Stimulus equivalence in language able and disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
  2. Hayes, S. C. (in press). A contextual approach to therapeutic change. In N. Jacobson (Ed.), Cognitive and behavior therapies in clinical practice. New York: Guilford.
  3. Mahoney, M. A (1974). Cognition and behavior modifica- tion. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
  4. Zettle, R. D. (1980, November). Insight: Rules and revelations. In S. C. Hayes (Chair), The baby and the bathwater: Radical behavioral interpretations oftraditional clinical phenomena. Symposium conducted at the annual convention of the Association for Advance- ment of Behavior Therapy, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Wichita State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Venue
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior
Published
1986-04
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
30-38
ISSN
  • 0889-9401 (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-8926
OpenAlex
W1520147444
Cited by
326
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Analysis of Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
reason-giving, verbal control, radical behaviorism, maladaptive behavior, therapeutic change, adult psychopathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review