Cited by 123Traffic and Road SafetySubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPersonality Traits and Psychology

Impulsivity-like traits and risky driving behaviors among college students

Open access
Pearson, Matthew R., Murphy, Elaine M., Doane, Ashley N.·2013·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

The present study examined the predictive effects of five impulsivity-like traits (Premeditation, Perseverance, Sensation Seeking, Negative Urgency, and Positive Urgency) on driving outcomes (driving errors, driving lapses, driving violations, cell phone driving, traffic citations, and traffic collisions). With a convenience sample of 266 college student drivers, we found that each of the impulsivity-like traits was related to multiple risky driving outcomes. Positive Urgency (tendency to act impulsively when experiencing negative affect) was the most robust predictor of risky driving outcomes. Positive Urgency is a relatively newly conceptualized impulsivity-like trait that was not examined in the driving literature previously, suggesting a strong need to further examine its role as a personality trait related to risky driving. These findings generally support the multidimensional assessment of impulsivity-like traits, and they specifically support the addition of Positive Urgency to a list of risk factors for risky driving behaviors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2013.01.009

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals highly sensitive to rewards or impulsive tend to engage in risky behaviors such as texting on cell phones while driving.

    “Evidence indicates that individuals, who are highly sensitive to rewards or impulsive, have a tendency to engage in risky behaviors such as texting on their cell phones while driving (Hayashi et al., 2015; Pearson et al., 2013).”

    From Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students (2024) · cites this paper as Pearson et al., 2013

    The Results (section 3.2; page unavailable) report that several impulsivity-like traits were associated with cell-phone driving among college students. The Measures (section 2.2) include sending and reading texts in that outcome, but do not report texting separately. Sensation Seeking was associated with cell-phone driving only in bivariate analysis; the association was no longer significant after controlling for other impulsivity-like traits (section 4.2). The paper does not establish the broader claim about reward sensitivity or individuals generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jackson DN Personality research from manual 1984 Goshen, NT Research Psychologists Press
  2. Muthén LK Muthén BO Mplus User’s Guide. Sixth Edition 1998–2010 Los Angeles, CA Muthén & Muthén
  3. Tellegen A Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire manual 1982 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearson, M. R., Murphy, E. M., & Doane, A. N.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Old Dominion University (US)
  • Chowan University (US)
Corresponding author
Pearson, Matthew R.
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
53
Pages
142-148
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023479110
Cited by
123
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
19.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32AA018108)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
risky driving behavior, positive urgency, negative urgency, sensation seeking, perseverance, premeditation, traffic offenses, traffic citations, traffic accidents, driving errors, personality traits
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Automobile Driving, Crime, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dangerous Behavior, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Psychological Tests, Students, Southeastern United States, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review