The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies to use fibrinogen as bioink for 3D bioprinting fibrin-based soft and hard tissues
Abstract
Fibrin gel has been widely used for engineering various types of tissues due to its biocompatible nature, biodegradability, tunable mechanical, and nanofibrous structural properties. Despite their promising regenerative capacity and extensive biocompatibility with various tissue types, fibrin-based biomaterials are often notoriously known as burdensome candidates for 3D biofabrication and bioprinting. The high viscosity of fibrin (crosslinked form) hinders proper ink extrusion, and its pre-polymer form, fibrinogen, is not capable of maintaining shape fidelity. To overcome these limitations and empower fibrinogen-based bioinks for fibrin biomimetics and regenerative applications, different strategies can be practiced. The aim of this review is to report the strategies that bring fabrication compatibility to these bioinks through mixing fibrinogen with printable biomaterials, using supporting bath supplemented with crosslinking agents, and crosslinking fibrin in situ. Moreover, the review discusses some of the recent advances in 3D bioprinting of biomimetic soft and hard tissues using fibrinogen-based bioinks, and highlights the impacts of these strategies on fibrin properties, its bioactivity, and the functionality of the consequent biomimetic tissue. Statement of Significance Due to its biocompatible nature, biodegradability, tunable mechanical and nanofibrous structural properties, fibrin gel has been widely employed in tissue engineering and more recently, used as bioink in 3D bioprinting. The fibrinogen's poor printable properties make it difficult to maintain the 3D shape of bioprinted constructs. Our work describes the strategies employed in tissue engineering to allow the 3D bioprinting of fibrin-based bioinks, such as the combination of fibrinogen with printable biomaterials, the in situ fibrin crosslinking, and the use of supporting bath supplemented with crosslinking agents. Further, this review discuss the application of 3D bioprinting technology to biofabricate fibrin-based soft and hard tissues for biomedical applications, and discuss current limitations and future of such in vitro models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels
Yue, K., Trujillo-de Santiago, G., Alvarez, M. M., Tamayol, A., Annabi, N., & Khademhosseini, A. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 · Cited by 3,146
Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture
Duval, K., Grover, H., Han, L.-H., Mou, Y., Pegoraro, A. F., Fredberg, J., & Chen, Z. (2017) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00036.2016 · Cited by 1,849
From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips
Huh, D., Hamilton, G. A., & Ingber, D. E. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.005 · Cited by 1,834
The stiffness of living tissues and its implications for tissue engineering
Guimarães, C. F., Gasperini, L., Marques, A. P., & Reis, R. L. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0169-1 · Cited by 1,515
Biofabrication strategies for 3D in vitro models and regenerative medicine
Moroni, L., Burdick, J. A., Highley, C., Lee, S. J., Morimoto, Y., Takeuchi, S., & Yoo, J. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0006-y · Cited by 753
Neutrophils and Wound Repair: Positive Actions and Negative Reactions
Wilgus, T. A., Roy, S., & McDaniel, J. C. (2013) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2012.0383 · Cited by 616
Human Skin 3D Bioprinting Using Scaffold‐Free Approach
Pourchet, L. J., Thepot, A., Albouy, M., Courtial, E. J., Boher, A., Blum, L. J., & Marquette, C. A. (2017) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201601101 · Cited by 352
Papadimitriou, C., Celikkaya, H., Cosacak, M. I., Mashkaryan, V., Bray, L., Bhattarai, P., Brandt, K., Hollak, H., Chen, X., He, S., et al. (2018) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.06.005 · Cited by 143
Cited by
3D printing of functional microrobots
Li, J., & Pumera, M. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01062f · Cited by 303
Natural Hydrogel-Based Bio-Inks for 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Fatimi, A., Okoro, O. V., Podstawczyk, D., Siminska-Stanny, J., & Shavandi, A. (2022) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels8030179 · Cited by 276
Biomaterials / bioinks and extrusion bioprinting
Chen, X. B., Fazel Anvari-Yazdi, A., Duan, X., Zimmerling, A., Gharraei, R., Sharma, N. K., Sweilem, S., & Ning, L. (2023) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.06.006 · Cited by 244
Developing fibrin-based biomaterials/scaffolds in tissue engineering
Li, S., Dan, X., Chen, H., Li, T., Liu, B., Ju, Y., Li, Y., Lei, L., & Fan, X. (2024) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.006 · Cited by 107
Constructing biomimetic liver models through biomaterials and vasculature engineering
Lv, W., Zhou, H., Aazmi, A., Yu, M., Xu, X., Yang, H., Huang, Y. Y. S., & Ma, L. (2022) · Regenerative Biomaterials · doi:10.1093/rb/rbac079 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- de Melo, B. A. G., Jodat, Y. A., Cruz, E. M., Benincasa, J. C., Shin, S. R., & Porcionatto, M. A.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 117
- Pages
- 60-76
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3087213565
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 8.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies to use fibrinogen as bioink for 3D bioprinting fibrin-based soft and hard tissues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.024
- The paper
- de Melo, B. A. G., Jodat, Y. A., Cruz, E. M., Benincasa, J. C., Shin, S. R., & Porcionatto, M. A. (2020). Strategies to use fibrinogen as bioink for 3D bioprinting fibrin-based soft and hard tissues. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
