Cited by 99Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Experiences of non-adherence to Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy: a qualitative study

Open access
Johansson, Olof, Michel, Teresa, Andersson, Gerhard, Paxling, Björn·2015·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Many trials on Internet-delivered psychological treatments have had problems with nonadherence, but not much is known about the subjective reasons for non-adhering. The aim of this study was to explore participants' experiences of non-adherence to Internet-delivered psychological treatment. Grounded theory was used to analyze data from seven in-depth interviews with persons who had non-adhered to a study on Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder . The process of non-adherence is described as an interaction between patient factors and treatment factors. A working model theory was generated to illustrate the experience of nonadherence. The model describes a process where treatment features such as workload, text-content complexity and treatment process don't match personal prerequisites regarding daily routines, perceived language skills and treatment expectations respectively, resulting in the decision to nonadhere. Negative effects were also stated as a reason for non-adherence. Several common strategies used for increasing adherence to Internet-delivered therapy in general are by these non-completers regarded as factors directly related to their reason for non-adherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2015.02.006

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johansson, O., Michel, T., Andersson, G., & Paxling, B.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Johansson, Olof
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
137-142
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993492637
Cited by
99
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Swedish Council for Working and Life Research (FAS 2007-0756)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
non-compliance, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, generalized anxiety disorder, treatment discontinuation, patient experience, treatment expectations, language skills, daily routine, adherence strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review