Cited by 90Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Brief report: cyberbullying perpetration and its associations with socio-demographics, aggressive behaviour at school, and mental health outcomes

Fletcher, Adam, Fitzgerald‐Yau, Natasha, Jones, Rebecca, Allen, Elizabeth, Viner, Russell M., Bonell, Chris·2014·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

Relatively little is known about those who cyberbully others, especially in a UK context. We drew on data from 1144 young people aged 12-13 in eight English secondary schools to examine the prevalence of cyberbullying perpetration and its associations with sociodemographics, other behaviours, and health outcomes. Overall, 14.1% of respondents reported ever cyberbullying others with no significant differences by gender or socioeconomic status. Drawing on mixed-effects logistic regression models, first we found a strong, dose-response relationship between aggressive behaviour at school and cyberbullying others, suggesting that cyberbullying may not only be a facet of wider patterns of bullying but also of aggression more broadly. Second, cyberbullying others was associated with poorer quality of life and with psychological difficulties but not with peer/social problems or worse mental wellbeing. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess whether such associations are causal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.10.005

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fletcher et al. (2014) reported poor quality of life and psychological difficulties among bullies (12-13 years, UK, N=1144).

    “Fletcher et al. (2014) | 12-13 (years) | 1144 UK | Bully | Poor quality of life and psychological difficulties”

    From A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Fletcher et al. (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fletcher, A., Fitzgerald‐Yau, N., Jones, R., Allen, E., Viner, R. M., & Bonell, C.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Fletcher, Adam
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-25
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
1393-1398
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2149960906
Cited by
90
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research (09/05/05)
  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (09/05/05)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying perpetration, school aggression, adolescents, high school students, quality of life, psychological difficulties, psychological well-being, peer problems, socioeconomic status, gender differences, bullying
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aggression, Child, England, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Prevalence, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review