Cited by 457Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Longitudinal Associations Between Cyberbullying Involvement and Adolescent Mental Health

Open access
Fahy, Amanda E., Stansfeld, Stephen A., Smuk, Melanie, Smith, Neil R., Cummins, Steven, Clark, Charlotte·2016·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose Cyberbullying differs from face-to-face bullying and may negatively influence adolescent mental health, but there is a lack of definitive research on this topic. This study examines longitudinal associations between cyberbullying involvement and adolescent mental health.Methods Participants were 2,480 teenagers taking part in the Olympic Regeneration in East London study. We collected information from participants when they were 12-13 years old and again 1 year later to examine links between involvement in cyberbullying and future symptoms of depression and social anxiety, and mental well-being.Results At baseline, 14% reported being cybervictims, 8% reported being cyberbullies, and 20% reported being cyberbully-victims in the previous year. Compared to uninvolved adolescents, cybervictims and cyberbully-victims were significantly more likely to report symptoms of depression (cybervictims: odds ratio [OR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.00, 2.06]; cyberbully-victims: OR = 1.54, 95% CI [1.13, 2.09]) and social anxiety (cybervictims: OR = 1.52, 95% CI [1.11, 2.07]; cyberbully-victims: OR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.10, 1.89]) but not below average well-being (cybervictims: relative risk ratio = 1.28, 95% CI [.86, 1.91]; cyberbully-victims: relative risk ratio = 1.38, 95% CI [.95, 1.99]) at 1 year follow-up, after adjustment for confounding factors including baseline mental health.Conclusions This study emphasizes the high prevalence of cyberbullying and the potential of cybervictimization as a risk factor for future depressive symptoms, social anxiety symptoms, and below average well-being among adolescents. Future research should identify protective factors and possible interventions to reduce adolescent cyberbullying.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.006

Cites

46 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mental health problems such as depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation are commonly identified as psychological consequences of cyberbullying victimization.

    “Mental health problems such as depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation are commonly identified as psychological consequences of cyberbullying victimization36,81–83.”

    From Umbrella review of meta-analyses on the risk factors, protective factors, consequences and interventions of cyberbullying victimization (2024) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Discussion and Results report that adolescent cybervictims were more likely than uninvolved peers to report depressive and social anxiety symptoms at follow-up. The paper does not report suicidal ideation as an outcome, and its longitudinal associations do not establish that victimization caused the symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cyberbullying can lead to increased levels of anxiety and depression.

    “increased levels of anxiety and depression [7]”
  • NLP can be used for text content analysis to detect patterns of abusive language, threats, derogatory remarks, and other harmful behavior.

    “Natural language processing (NLP) can be used for text content analysis, such as social media posts, comments, and messages, to detect patterns of abusive language, threats, derogatory remarks, and other harmful behavior.”

    From Cyberbullying Sexism Harassment Identification by Metaheurustics-Tuned eXtreme Gradient Boosting (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Cyberbullying involvement section describes a questionnaire used to assess adolescents’ experiences, and the Analytic approach section describes logistic regression of mental-health outcomes. Neither those passages nor the passages found by searching for NLP and automated analysis of social-media text address using NLP to detect abusive or threatening language. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cyberbullying is associated with anxiety, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation.

    “It is associated with anxiety, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation, and reportedly has a stronger association with depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation than traditional bullying (Bottino, Bottino, Regina, Correia, & Ribeiro, 2015;Fahy et al., 2016;Hamm et al., 2015;John et al., 2018;Katsaras et al., 2018;Nixon, 2014;van Geel, Vedder, & Tanilon, 2014).”
  • Cyberbullying reportedly has a stronger association with depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation than traditional bullying.

    “It is associated with anxiety, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation, and reportedly has a stronger association with depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation than traditional bullying (Bottino, Bottino, Regina, Correia, & Ribeiro, 2015;Fahy et al., 2016;Hamm et al., 2015;John et al., 2018;Katsaras et al., 2018;Nixon, 2014;van Geel, Vedder, & Tanilon, 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fahy, A. E., Stansfeld, S. A., Smuk, M., Smith, N. R., Cummins, S., & Clark, C.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Fahy, Amanda E.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
502-509
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2510956470
Cited by
457
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 9
FWCI
93.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (09/3005/09)
  • Public Health Research Programme (09/3005/09)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyber victimization, adolescent mental health, depressive symptoms, social anxiety, psychological well-being, bullying risk factors, longitudinal associations
MeSH terms
Adolescent Health, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Quality of Life, Odds Ratio, Crime Victims, Internet, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review