Cited by 155Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDiabetes Treatment and ManagementBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 249 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet; none of the 183 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Nutritional priorities to support GLP-1 therapy for obesity: a joint Advisory from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, the American Society for Nutrition, the Obesity Medicine Association, and The Obesity Society

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and combination medications (hereafter collectively referred to as GLP-1s) are shifting the treatment landscape for obesity. However, real-world challenges and limited clinician and public knowledge on nutritional and lifestyle interventions can limit GLP-1 efficacy, equitable results, and cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify pragmatic priorities for nutrition and other lifestyle interventions relevant to GLP-1 treatment of obesity for the practicing clinician. METHODS: An expert group comprising multiple clinical and research disciplines appraised the scientific literature, informed by expert knowledge and clinical experience, to identify and summarize relevant topics, priorities, and emerging directions. RESULTS: GLP-1s reduce body weight by 5% to 18% in trials, with modestly lower effects in real-world analyses, and multiple demonstrated clinical benefits. Challenges include side effects, especially gastrointestinal; nutritional deficiencies due to calorie reduction; muscle and bone loss; low long-term adherence with subsequent weight regain; and high costs with resulting low cost-effectiveness. Numerous practice guidelines recommend multicomponent, evidence-based nutritional and behavioral therapy for adults with obesity, but use of such therapies with GLP-1s is not widespread. Priorities to address this include: (a) patient-centered initiation of GLP-1s, including goals for weight reduction and health; (b) baseline screening, including usual dietary habits, emotional triggers, disordered eating, and relevant medical conditions; (c) comprehensive exam including muscle strength, function, and body composition assessment; (d) social determinants of health screening; (e) and lifestyle assessment including aerobic activity, strength training, sleep, mental stress, substance use, and social connections. During GLP-1 use, nutritional and medical management of gastrointestinal side effects is critical, as is navigating altered dietary preferences and intakes, preventing nutrient deficiencies, preserving muscle and bone mass through resistance training and appropriate diet, and complementary lifestyle interventions. Supportive strategies include group-based visits, registered dietitian nutritionist counseling, telehealth and digital platforms, and Food is Medicine interventions. Drug access, food and nutrition insecurity, and nutrition and culinary knowledge influence equitable obesity management with GLP-1s. Emerging areas for more study include dietary modulation of endogenous GLP-1, strategies to improve compliance, nutritional priorities for weight maintenance post-cessation, combination or staged intensive lifestyle management, and diagnostic criteria for clinical obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based nutritional and lifestyle strategies play a pivotal role to address key challenges around GLP-1 treatment of obesity, making clinicians more effective in advancing their patients' health.

Checked 2026-10-06 · 3 references not checked yet

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This joint Advisory from four clinical societies summarizes pragmatic nutritional and lifestyle priorities to support GLP-1 therapy for obesity, emphasizing screening, GI side-effect management, nutrient adequacy, muscle/bone preservation, and equitable implementation. It concludes that structured nutrition and behavioral care before, during, and after GLP-1 use can mitigate key challenges and improve long-term outcomes.

Key findings

  • GLP-1s produce placebo-adjusted weight reduction of 5% to 18% in trials, with lower real-world effects (e.g., about 8% with diabetes and 11% without diabetes at 60 weeks with semaglutide 2.4 mg/d); discontinuation is high (e.g., 50%–67% at 1 year and 85% at 2 years in some real-world data).
  • Common GI side effects include nausea (25%–44%), diarrhea (19%–30%), vomiting (8%–24%), constipation (17%–24%), and abdominal pain (9%–20%); caloric intake falls by 16%–39%, raising risk of inadequate intakes of iron, calcium, magnesium, zinc, and vitamins A, D, E, K, B1, B12, and C.
  • Rapid weight loss can cause muscle and bone loss: in STEP 1, of a mean 13.6-kg weight reduction, 8.3 kg (62%) was fat mass and 5.3 kg (38%) was lean body mass, corresponding to about 20% of total weight reduction as muscle loss; structured resistance training at least 3 times weekly plus at least 150 min/week of moderate aerobic exercise is recommended to help preserve muscle and bone.
  • Costs are high: US list prices are about $12,000–$16,000 per year, discounted to about $7,000–$8,000; nonindustry cost-effectiveness analyses report net costs per quality-adjusted life year of $237,000–$483,000, exceeding common thresholds.

Methods

  • An expert group comprising multiple clinical and research disciplines appraised the scientific literature, informed by expert knowledge and clinical experience, to identify and summarize relevant topics, priorities, and emerging directions.
  • The paper is a narrative joint Advisory, not a systematic review or meta-analysis; it synthesizes evidence and provides practice guidance, tables, and a figure for clinicians.
  • No primary data collection or formal quantitative synthesis is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that peer-reviewed evidence has not kept pace with clinical and public interest in GLP-1s, that some guidance is based on limited available evidence and expert opinion, and that specific nutritional behaviors for weight maintenance after GLP-1 cessation have not been rigorously studied in controlled trials.
  • It also notes limited direct evidence on GLP-1 use with or without registered dietitian nutritionist–provided medical nutrition therapy, and lack of standardization in how “intensive” lifestyle intervention is defined or implemented across trials.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative expert Advisory, it does not describe a systematic search strategy, formal risk-of-bias assessment, or evidence-grading process, so recommendations may reflect expert consensus where data are sparse.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.04.023

Cites

249 of 252 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 183 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 82 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 72
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 20
81 of 81
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Practical guidance for clinicians to implement a structured lifestyle approach with GLP-1s is limited.

    “However, practical guidance for clinicians to implement such an approach is limited.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The potential for more robust, structured nutrition and lifestyle therapy to mitigate weight gain after GLP-1 cessation has not been studied in controlled trials.

    “The potential for more robust, structured nutrition and lifestyle therapy to mitigate weight gain after GLP-1 cessation has not been studied in controlled trials.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Population risk and trends in obesity over time are predominantly driven by lifestyle trends related to cultural, community, and environmental factors.

    “Although individual risk can be modified by genetic influences, population risk and trends in obesity over time are predominantly driven by lifestyle trends related to cultural, community, and environmental factors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    GI side effects are generally more likely to occur during GLP-1 initiation or dose escalation.

    “GI side effects are generally more likely to occur during GLP-1 initiation or dose escalation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Nausea is the most common GI side effect and often occurs in the morning or after longer periods without eating.

    “Nausea is the most common GI side effect and often occurs in the morning or after longer periods without eating.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Constipation is common with weight loss.

    “Constipation is common with weight loss and should be managed proactively.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Extended constipation can lead to reactive diarrhea.

    “Extended constipation can also lead to reactive diarrhea.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sarcopenia and osteopenia are seen in individuals who are older, sedentary, chronically ill, malnourished, or with type 2 diabetes.

    “Individuals should be assessed for risk of sarcopenia and osteopenia, seen in individuals who are older, sedentary, chronically ill, malnourished, or with type 2 diabetes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    GMVs are covered by insurance payers, allowing broad access.

    “GMVs are covered by insurance payers, allowing broad access.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most individuals prescribed GLP-1s for obesity treatment stop taking the drug within one year.

    “While persistent GLP-1 therapy is recommended for obesity control and weight maintenance, most individuals prescribed GLP-1s for obesity treatment stop taking the drug within one year.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most state Medicaid programs have followed Medicare in limiting MNT coverage.

    “Most state Medicaid programs have followed suit.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Commercial plan coverage varies widely and may provide MNT counseling for obesity but with annual or lifetime limits.

    “Commercial plan coverage varies more widely and may provide MNT counseling for obesity but with annual or lifetime limits.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinicians often lack sufficient knowledge about food, nutrition, and healthy food preparation.

    “Clinicians are not immune to these societal trends and often lack sufficient knowledge about food, nutrition, and healthy food preparation.”
13 of 13

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Semaglutide 2.4 mg is described as both daily and weekly

    Minor

    The efficacy section specifies semaglutide 2.4 mg per day, whereas Table 1 specifies the same dose per week. Those are different dosing frequencies.

  • SURMOUNT 3 claim cites a STEP 3 paper

    Minor

    The cited reference [178] is identified in the reference list as the STEP 3 semaglutide trial, not the SURMOUNT 3 tirzepatide trial used to support the stated 25% reduction.

  • Table 1 gives a different follow-up time from the text

    Minor

    Table 1 labels its efficacy outcomes as occurring at 52 weeks, while the text describes the outcomes in that table as measured after 56 to 72 weeks.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 254 references

2 of the 254 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 2024, FDA clarifies policies for compounders as national GLP-1 supply begins to stabilize, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  2. Atlas, 2023, Medications for obesity management: effectiveness and value, J Manag Care Spec Pharm, 29, 569
  3. Tondt, 2024, 2024 Obesity Algorithm® E-book, Obes. Med. Assoc.
  4. Weber, 2024, Ozempic could crush the junk food industry. But it is fighting back, The New York Times Magazine
  5. Anita, 2024, Group medical appointments for intensive lifestyle treatment for obesity in Cleveland Clinic primary care practices, Patient Cent. Outcomes Res. Inst.
  6. US Congress. United States Code: Social Security Act, U.S.C. § 1395x: Definitions. From Title 42 -The Public Health and Welfare. Chapter 7-Social Security. Subchapter XVII-Health Insurance for Aged And Disabled. Part E-Miscellaneous Provisions.
  7. 2024, Proposed rule: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Contract Year 2026 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage Program, Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Program, Medicare Cost Plan Program, and Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly, Federal Register, United States Government
  8. 2024, FDA’s Concerns with unapproved GLP-1 drugs used for weight loss, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  9. Radcliffe, 2023, Mounjaro may work better than ozempic for weightloss, study finds

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–155 of 155

Metadata

Authors
Mozaffarian, D., Agarwal, M., Aggarwal, M., Alexander, L., Apovian, C. M., Bindlish, S., Bonnet, J., Butsch, W. S., Christensen, S., Gianos, E., Gulati, M., Gupta, A., Horn, D., Kane, R. M., Saluja, J., Sannidhi, D., Stanford, F. C., & Callahan, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Lenox Hill Hospital (US)
  • UConn Health (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Mozaffarian, Dariush
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-07
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
344-367
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410885131
Cited by
154
References
254
Citations by year
2026: 128 · 2025: 26
FWCI
86.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Suomen Kardiologinen Seura
  • National Institutes of Health (2R01 HL115189, P30 DK04056, UE5 DK137285, U24 DK132733)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
obesity treatment, dietary intervention, lifestyle intervention, weight management, gastrointestinal adverse effects, nutritional deficiency, weight regain, adherence, food as medicine, social determinants of health, nutritional insecurity, telemedicine, resistance training, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Humans, Life Style, Obesity, United States, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review