Cited by 155Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and Health

Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study: preeclampsia

Open access
Yogev, Chen, Hod, Coustan, Oats, David H. McIntyre, Metzger, Löwe +7 more·2010·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine associations of fasting C-peptide, BMI, and maternal glucose with risk of preeclampsia, in a multicenter multinational study. STUDY DESIGN Secondary analysis of blinded observational cohort study. Subjects underwent a 75-g OGTT at 24–32 weeks gestation. Associations of preeclampsia with fasting C-peptide, BMI, and maternal glucose were assessed using multiple logistic regression analyses, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Of 21,364 women included in analyses, 5.2% developed preeclampsia. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for preeclampsia for 1 SD higher fasting C-peptide (0.87 ug/L), BMI (5.1 kg/m2), fasting (6.9 mg/dl), 1-hour (30.9 mg/dl), and 2-hour plasma glucose (23.5 mg/dl) were 1.28 (1.20, 1.36), 1.60 (95% CI 1.60–1.71), 1.08 (95% CI 1.00–1.16), 1.19 (95% CI 1.11–1.28), and 1.21 (1.13–1.30), respectively. CONCLUSION Results indicate strong, independent associations of fasting C-peptide and BMI with preeclampsia. Maternal glucose levels (below diabetes) had weaker associations with preeclampsia, particularly after adjustment for fasting C-peptide and BMI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.024

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some secondary outcomes, including risks of shoulder dystocia and/or birth injury and preeclampsia, were also associated with maternal glycemia.

    “Some secondary outcomes, including risks of shoulder dystocia and/or birth injury and preeclampsia, were also associated with maternal glycemia (257).”

    From Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (2023) · cites this paper as [257]

    The Results and Comment sections report that preeclampsia became more frequent as maternal glucose increased, although the association weakened after adjustment for C-peptide. Our copy does not report an association between maternal glycemia and shoulder dystocia or birth injury; searches for those outcomes found no supporting passage. No page numbers were provided. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yogev, Chen, Hod, Coustan, Oats, McIntyre, D. H., Metzger, Löwe, Dyer, Dooley, Trimble, McCance, Hadden, Persson, & Rogers
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
202
Issue
3
Pages
255.e1-255.e7
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W17552291
Cited by
155
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR00048, M01-RR00080)
  • Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
  • Diabetes UK (RD04/0002756)
  • American Diabetes Association
  • Novo Nordisk
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-HD34242, R01-HD34243)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
preeclampsia, fasting C-peptide, body mass index, maternal blood glucose, oral glucose tolerance test, hyperglycemia, adverse pregnancy outcomes, insulin resistance, gestational diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Fasting, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review